Skip to content

reuse provided site instance if available #40

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2016

Conversation

mojavelinux
Copy link
Contributor

@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ module Jekyll
module Watcher
extend self

def watch(options)
def watch(options, site = nil)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wonderful! Would you mind adding a comment that the site is only populated in Jekyll v3.2 (upcoming) and up? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gladly!

@parkr
Copy link
Member

parkr commented Jul 19, 2016

LGTM! Just one thought above.

@parkr
Copy link
Member

parkr commented Jul 19, 2016

/cc @envygeeks

- reuse provided site instance (addresses Jekyll core issue #4858)
- add API documentation to watch method
@mojavelinux
Copy link
Contributor Author

API documentation added!

@parkr
Copy link
Member

parkr commented Jul 20, 2016

LGTM! Thank you.

@envygeeks
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@parkr
Copy link
Member

parkr commented Jul 20, 2016

@jekyllbot: merge

@jekyllbot jekyllbot merged commit 257fbc9 into jekyll:master Jul 20, 2016
jekyllbot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2016
@parkr
Copy link
Member

parkr commented Jul 20, 2016

released in v1.5.0!

@mojavelinux mojavelinux deleted the jekyll-issue-4858 branch July 20, 2016 19:46
@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 23, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants