Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump honnef.co/go/tools from 0.1.4 to 0.3.2 #53

Closed

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github May 18, 2022

Bumps honnef.co/go/tools from 0.1.4 to 0.3.2.

Release notes

Sourced from honnef.co/go/tools's releases.

Staticcheck 2022.1.2 (v0.3.2)

This release addresses the following false positives, crashes, infinite loops, and performance issues:

  • For certain packages that contain tens of thousands of types and methods, such as those generated by ygot, Staticcheck now finishes much faster.
  • Several infinite loops when handling recursive type parameters have been fixed
  • S1009 no longer mistakes user-defined functions named len for the builtin (issue 1181)
  • ST1015 no longer reorders switch statements if their order is significant due to the use of fallthrough (issue 1188)
  • SA1013 now detects constants more robustly, avoiding both false negatives and false positives. Furthermore, it makes sure that offending methods implement io.Seeker and doesn’t just rely on the name Seek (issue 1213).
  • SA5008 now understands more third-party extensions to json struct tags
  • A crash involving functions named _ has been fixed (issue 1268)
  • A crash involving slicing type parameters of type string | []byte has been fixed (issue 1270)
  • SA1019 now handles imports of deprecated standard library packages in the same way it handles other deprecated API, taking the targeted Go version into consideration (issue 1117)

Additionally it is strongly recommended to use Go 1.18.2 for building Staticcheck, as it fixes further generics-related bugs in the type checker.

Staticcheck 2022.1.1 (v0.3.1)

This release addresses the following false positives, crashes, and infinite loops:

Staticcheck 2022.1 (v0.3.0)

Staticcheck 2022.1 adds support for Go 1.18 and generics, adds and tweaks some checks, and introduces the new -matrix and -merge flags.

Read the full release notes at https://staticcheck.io/changes/2022.1

Staticcheck 2021.1.2 (v0.2.2)

This release fixes some false positives and crashes.

Read the full release notes at dominikh/go-tools#2021

Staticcheck 2021.1.1 (v0.2.1)

This release adds support for new language features in Go 1.17, namely conversions from slices to array pointers, the unsafe.Add function, and the unsafe.Slice function.

Additionally, it fixes some false positives.

Read the full release notes at https://staticcheck.io/changes/2021.1#2021.1.1

Staticcheck 2021.1 (v0.2.0)

Read the full release notes at https://staticcheck.io/changes/2021.1

Staticcheck 2020.2.4 (v0.1.4)

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 7586196 Version 2022.1.2 (v0.3.2)
  • 62855f4 website: add 2022.1.2 release notes
  • 78b8b4c Replace use of deprecated packages.NeedExportsFile
  • c336ff7 Update dependency on golang.org/x/tools
  • c6cc483 go/ir: do not panic on generic type slice expression
  • b345e26 staticcheck: don't panic if we can't find an IR function for an AST node
  • 7ef9e7d staticcheck: recognize more options in JSON tags
  • 329c593 staticcheck: replace an unnecessary use of PathEnclosingInterval
  • 26cf12e staticcheck: don't chase infinite chain of instantiations
  • a285988 Update dependency on golang.org/x/tools
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [honnef.co/go/tools](https://github.com/dominikh/go-tools) from 0.1.4 to 0.3.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/dominikh/go-tools/releases)
- [Commits](dominikh/go-tools@v0.1.4...v0.3.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: honnef.co/go/tools
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code labels May 18, 2022
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Aug 1, 2022

Superseded by #61.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Aug 1, 2022
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/go_modules/honnef.co/go/tools-0.3.2 branch August 1, 2022 01:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants