Fix formatting whats-new.rst for doc-building
#366
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JoranAngevaare
changed the title
whatsnew.rst for doc-building
JoranAngevaare
changed the title
whatsnew.rst for doc-buildingwhats-new.rst for doc-building
JoranAngevaare
changed the title
whats-new.rst for doc-buildingwhats_new.rst for doc-building
JoranAngevaare
changed the title
whats_new.rst for doc-buildingwhats-new.rst for doc-building
Closed
jbusecke
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix documentation building
This is probably more related to one sub-packages of sphinx that is actually causing the issue, but I think this should do the trick to get the documentation building back up.
New page is on:
https://cmip6-preprocessing--366.org.readthedocs.build/en/366/whats-new.html
First try (6474e49) did look to kind of bad looking information:
Second try (de712ae) also yielded something horrible
The third try (fdbe8c3) actually fixes the issue
The fourth commit fixes the strange rst syntax which no one remembers ef138c9. Now the hyperlinks to the authors work.
Commit nr. 5/6 adds this PR to the
whats-new.rst