Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented max_docs #62

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Implemented max_docs #62

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

BytingBitz
Copy link

@BytingBitz BytingBitz commented Feb 6, 2024

Per issue #56, implemented max_docs to allow easier ignoring of common terms. Updated network.py and documentation.

Per issue jboynyc#56, implemented max_docs to allow easier ignoring of common terms. Updated network.py and documentation.
@BytingBitz
Copy link
Author

Just realised this pull request failed some checks, should be linted correctly now. If I need to fix anything else just let me know!

@BytingBitz
Copy link
Author

Poetry confuses me - I generated a poetry.lock file via poetry lock --no-update though this caused conflicts. I don't see any reason why the code changes should have directly or indirectly caused any dependency changes. So, if I did it correctly, I just grabbed the existing upstream poetry.lock file. Reliant on your expertise here for if this is the right action.

@BytingBitz
Copy link
Author

@jboynyc Anything else I need to do or fix here? Hope you are well!

@jboynyc
Copy link
Owner

jboynyc commented Apr 2, 2024

sorry, I've just been very busy with other work! I will prepare a new release with this soon.

@jboynyc
Copy link
Owner

jboynyc commented May 7, 2024

Added to the dev branch in 3226642 for inclusion in next release. Thanks again!

@jboynyc jboynyc closed this May 7, 2024
@BytingBitz
Copy link
Author

Cheers @jboynyc. I would flag that it is acceptable for min_docs to equal max_docs? Benefit is marginal but it does allow one to filter to an exact frequency - potentially having niche application.

@jboynyc
Copy link
Owner

jboynyc commented May 13, 2024

Makes sense, I hadn't considered that! I'll change it back before the release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants