-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 794
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handles ValueErrors with invalid hex values in query strings (#954) #963
Merged
auvipy
merged 9 commits into
jazzband:master
from
duck-nukem:handle_oauthlib_value_errors
Oct 19, 2021
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
040bbda
Handles ValueErrors with invalid hex values in query strings and rera…
duck-nukem b04ea0f
Unified erorr naming (err and error) when handling ValueErrors
duck-nukem de82814
Added Alex Szabó to AUTHORS
duck-nukem 20aae2c
Adds fix message to CHANGELOG.md
duck-nukem 683ec0f
Narrows handling of ValueErrors to a specific error (invalid hex in q…
duck-nukem c69fb89
Merge branch 'master' into handle_oauthlib_value_errors
duck-nukem cfcf5c8
Merge branch 'master' into handle_oauthlib_value_errors
duck-nukem 7f17267
Fixes formatting
duck-nukem e5cca4e
Merge branch 'master' into handle_oauthlib_value_errors
auvipy File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As raised in #954 (comment) is catching all
ValueError
s too broad? I think it should be fine, but it might end up exposing error messages users were never meant to see, possibly resulting in security flaws?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm also a bit worried about this catching "real issues" and causing them to end up not being logged (for example in one Django setup I know
SuspiciousOperation
won't get logged into Sentry but a rawValueError
would). So I could imagine some time lost as this absorbs a real error.The minimalist approach here would be to check if
error.message == "invalid hex string"
(or whatever) and only transform the error then (otherwise just reraising theValueError
). But to be honest this might not be a major thing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've updated it now to check the message of the error, otherwise re-raises the exception as-is.