proposed new api; not tested #731
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
michaeldeistler
force-pushed
the
michael2
branch
from
24e42a3 to
e8f4463
Compare
michaeldeistler
force-pushed
the
michael2
branch
from
e8f4463 to
10dec18
Compare
michaeldeistler
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2025
* proposed new api; not tested --------- Co-authored-by: Matthijspals <matthijs-pals@hotmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR proposes to use as much as possible the existing
init_fnandstep_fn.The only additional thing introduced by Matthijs's PR is now the utility to ravel or unravel the states. For all else, we rely on
init_fnandstep_fnfromjx.integrate.