ci: Ensure the right cargo subcommands are picked - #71
Merged
Merged
Conversation
CI started to fail with errors while running `cargo clippy` with `--ignore-environment`.
Using this flag clears most of the environment variables, such as the
system's $PATH, helping create more isolated builds. We want to avoid
using system binaries, which might differ. For this reason, this failure
was puzzling to me, most of the environment is under our precise
control:
* The toolchain, such as `cargo`, `rustc` and others is defined in our
`nix` flake and we commit the lockfile. No upgrades happened between
the last good and the first bad CI runs.
* Cargo deps are also locked via its lockfile, and there were no
upgrades either.
* We could not reproduce this issue in the 2 boxes we tried.
There are two potential sources of non isolation left, (1) the base
image that GitHub Actions runners use and (2) the `nix` version we run
as we don't currently pin them (this will be fixed later on).
Unfortunately, even pinning them to a version released before the
breakage was introduced didn't fix the problem at hand.
We were not convinced that (1) was the issue was we liberally use
`--ignore-environment` which will prevent the environment getting
tainted, but after some tests we saw this:
**with a clean environment**
```
$ nix develop --ignore-environment
$ type cargo-clippy
cargo-clippy is /nix/store/vw1g8fjbapmwgsfd5cz3h7gjzjim6xrz-rust-default-1.81.0-nightly-2024-06-20/bin/cargo-clippy
$ type cargo
cargo is /nix/store/vw1g8fjbapmwgsfd5cz3h7gjzjim6xrz-rust-default-1.81.0-nightly-2024-06-20/bin/cargo
$ strace -f cargo clippy --help |& grep cargo-clippy
statx(AT_FDCWD, "/home/javierhonduco/.cargo/bin/cargo-clippy", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, STATX_ALL, {stx_mask=STATX_ALL|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0755, stx_size=14881096, ...}) = 0
execve("/home/javierhonduco/.cargo/bin/cargo-clippy", ["/home/javierhonduco/.cargo/bin/c"..., "clippy", "--help"], 0x5555575c7180 /* 113 vars */) = 0
[pid 284009] statx(AT_FDCWD, "/home/javierhonduco/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/cargo-clippy", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, STATX_ALL, 0x7fffffff7d90) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
[pid 284009] execve("/home/javierhonduco/.cargo/bin/cargo-clippy", ["cargo-clippy", "clippy", "--help"], 0x555556080300 /* 117 vars */ <unfinished ...>
[pid 284009] statx(AT_FDCWD, "/home/javierhonduco/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/cargo-clippy", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, STATX_ALL, 0x7fffffff7c90) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
```
note the wrong `cargo-clippy` binary (/home/javierhonduco/.cargo/bin/cargo-clippy), provided by the system rather
than by `nix`.
**without a clean environment**
```
$ nix develop
$ strace -f cargo clippy --help |& grep cargo-clippy
[...]
statx(AT_FDCWD, "/nix/store/vw1g8fjbapmwgsfd5cz3h7gjzjim6xrz-rust-default-1.81.0-nightly-2024-06-20/bin/cargo-clippy", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, STATX_ALL, {stx_mask=STATX_ALL|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0555, stx_size=1453128, ...}) = 0
[...]
```
which shows the expected path for `cargo-clippy`.
After some more debugging it was clear that the main difference was in
`$PATH`, as in the non isolated environment both the `nix` provided
binaries were added first, and then there was an entry for
`/home/javierhonduco/.cargo/bin`, which includes the system-provided
binaries that _are not_ used by cargo subcommands as the order of the
search path is respected.
This didn't seem to make a lot of sense until we found
https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/11023/files, which has this
comment:
> If `$CARGO_HOME/bin` is not in a path, prefer it over anything in `$PATH`.
So, in summary, since we were cleaning $PATH and $CARGO_HOME/bin was not
present anymore, even if $PATH contains all the right cargo subcommand
binaries, `cargo` will fall back to executing binaries in ~/.cargo/bin.
This debugging was complicated by the fact that we could not easily
reproduce this issue locally, and that we expected no leakeage from the
environment, but we need to be mindful that `nix` doesn't have a 'real'
filesystem sandbox such as buck2 or bazel.
Hence the initial issue was caused due to a different `cargo-clippy`
binary that somehow caused this issue, which is not totally understood
at the time:
```
554 | pub use rstest_macros::fixture;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ can't find crate
error[E0463]: can't find crate for `rstest_macros`
--> /home/runner/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/rstest-0.21.0/src/lib.rs:1357:9
|
1357 | pub use rstest_macros::rstest;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ can't find crate
```
I don't have to dig deeper, but perhaps an upgrade of our Rust toolchain
will show issues. Will keep an eye for this in case there are any bugs
lying around.
I verified that there was a base image upgrade around the time the issue
started to happen in
actions/runner-images@a68ad81.
Test Plan
=========
CI
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CI started to fail with errors while running
cargo clippywith--ignore-environment. Using this flag clears most of the environment variables, such as the system's $PATH, helping create more isolated builds. We want to avoid using system binaries, which might differ. For this reason, this failure was puzzling to me, most of the environment is under our precise control:cargo,rustcand others is defined in ournixflake and we commit the lockfile. No upgrades happened between the last good and the first bad CI runs.There are two potential sources of non isolation left, (1) the base image that GitHub Actions runners use and (2) the
nixversion we run as we don't currently pin them (this will be fixed later on). Unfortunately, even pinning them to a version released before the breakage was introduced didn't fix the problem at hand.We were not convinced that (1) was the issue was we liberally use
--ignore-environmentwhich will prevent the environment getting tainted, but after some tests we saw this:with a clean environment
note the wrong
cargo-clippybinary (/home/javierhonduco/.cargo/bin/cargo-clippy), provided by the system rather than bynix.without a clean environment
which shows the expected path for
cargo-clippy.After some more debugging it was clear that the main difference was in
$PATH, as in the non isolated environment both thenixprovided binaries were added first, and then there was an entry for/home/javierhonduco/.cargo/bin, which includes the system-provided binaries that are not used by cargo subcommands as the order of the search path is respected.This didn't seem to make a lot of sense until we found rust-lang/cargo#11023, which has this comment:
So, in summary, since we were cleaning $PATH and $CARGO_HOME/bin was not present anymore, even if $PATH contains all the right cargo subcommand binaries,
cargowill fall back to executing binaries in ~/.cargo/bin.This debugging was complicated by the fact that we could not easily reproduce this issue locally, and that we expected no leakeage from the environment, but we need to be mindful that
nixdoesn't have a 'real' filesystem sandbox such as buck2 or bazel.Hence the initial issue was caused due to a different
cargo-clippybinary that somehow caused this issue, which is not totally understood at the time:I don't have to dig deeper, but perhaps an upgrade of our Rust toolchain will show issues. Will keep an eye for this in case there are any bugs lying around.
I verified that there was a base image upgrade around the time the issue started to happen in
actions/runner-images@a68ad81.
Test Plan
CI