Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should the binary be called libyear-rb or libyear-bundler? #1

Closed
sbleon opened this issue Mar 10, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Should the binary be called libyear-rb or libyear-bundler? #1

sbleon opened this issue Mar 10, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@sbleon
Copy link

sbleon commented Mar 10, 2017

I noticed that the npm version's binary is libyear-npm. Maybe this version should have a more specific binary name too?

This could leave the libyear binary name available for a future project that knew how to run all of the various specific libyear-*s and aggregate them :-)
@jaredbeck
Copy link
Owner

Makes sense. I'll look into changing it.

jaredbeck added a commit to jaredbeck/libyear-bundler that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2017
@jaredbeck
Rename project to libyear-bundler
4fcea65 
jaredbeck/libyear-rb#1
@jaredbeck
Copy link
Owner

jaredbeck commented Mar 10, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Closed by release 0.2.0. Going forward please use libyear-bundler.

This could leave the libyear binary name available for a future project that knew how to run all of the various specific libyear-*s and aggregate them :-)

It's a great idea, let's do it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sbleon @jaredbeck