[query] Move trace handler to server level

[mahadzaryab1]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Resolves Move traceResponseHandler #6141

Description of the changes

• Move the trace response handler to the server level so that it is applied to the whole server rather than just within the API handler.

How was this change tested?

• Unit test

Checklist

• I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• I have signed all commits
• I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test
  • for jaeger-ui: yarn lint and yarn test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.47%. Comparing base (43d2367) to head (8d9f3cb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6147   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.47%   96.47%           
=======================================
  Files         353      354    +1     
  Lines       20107    20107           
=======================================
  Hits        19398    19398           
  Misses        524      524           
  Partials      185      185           

Flag	Coverage Δ
badger_v1	8.32% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2	1.68% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1	14.40% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2	1.62% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1	14.40% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2	1.62% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1	18.53% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1	18.61% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
elasticsearch-8.x-v1	18.77% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-8.x-v2	1.67% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
grpc_v1	9.50% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2	7.01% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v1	8.89% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v2	1.68% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2	1.67% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
opensearch-1.x-v1	18.66% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1	18.66% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
opensearch-2.x-v2	1.67% <ø> (ø)
tailsampling-processor	0.47% <ø> (ø)
unittests	95.38% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mahadzaryab1]

i believe the unit test failure is transient - rerun should fix it