Skip to content

Initial IDEs review#270

Merged
jabrena merged 33 commits intomainfrom
feature/review
Sep 2, 2025
Merged

Initial IDEs review#270
jabrena merged 33 commits intomainfrom
feature/review

Conversation

@jabrena
Copy link
Owner

@jabrena jabrena commented Aug 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Adopted dual-prompt format (Interactive User Prompt + User Prompt) across Java rules.
    • Added new rules: 100 (generate rules list), 164 (profiling compare), expanded coding rules (123–128), and 170 (documentation).
  • Documentation
    • Overhauled Java Cursor Rules and templates; reintroduced/standardized Maven, Design, Testing, Refactoring, Performance, Profiling sections.
    • README updated with new prompt taxonomy (Interactive, Consultative, System), corrected naming, added image, and link to latest review.
    • Added a new comparative review document (docs/reviews/review-20250829.md).

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This PR updates Java cursor rules documentation to a dual-prompt format (Interactive User Prompt and User Prompt), adds new rules (e.g., 100 and 170), normalizes prompt references, reintroduces Maven/design/coding/testing/refactoring/profiling entries, revises README taxonomy and wording, and adds a new comparative review document.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Rule catalog: dual-prompt migration and expansion
.cursor/rules/100-java-cursor-rules-list.md, CURSOR-RULES-JAVA.md, generator/src/main/resources/fragments/java-cursor-rules-list-template.md
Introduces “Generate this list” (rule 100), adds/updates documentation rule (170), re-adds Maven/design/coding/testing/refactoring/profiling entries, converts single “Prompt” to dual “Interactive User Prompt” + “User Prompt”, and normalizes prompt references (removing .md suffix).
README taxonomy updates
README.md
Revises note about JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA, removes timestamp, links latest review; expands “What is a System prompt?”; refactors “Types of System prompts” into Interactive, Consultative, and System prompts with updated examples.
New review document
docs/reviews/review-20250829.md
Adds a comparison review of multiple AI coding assistants with a summary table, notes, recommendations, and acknowledgements.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A rabbit taps the keys with glee,
Two prompts now guide our doc-struck sea.
Maven hums, profiling sings,
Diagrams sprout with documentation wings.
In README fields where labels grow,
The garden’s trimmed—onward we go! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f31ca4 and f18b66e.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .cursor/rules/100-java-cursor-rules-list.md (1 hunks)
  • CURSOR-RULES-JAVA.md (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/reviews/review-20250829.md (1 hunks)
  • generator/src/main/resources/fragments/java-cursor-rules-list-template.md (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jabrena jabrena changed the title Initial review Initial IDEs review Aug 29, 2025
@jabrena jabrena marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2025 17:00
@jabrena jabrena merged commit 9c98e39 into main Sep 2, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
@jabrena jabrena deleted the feature/review branch September 2, 2025 17:00
This was referenced Sep 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant