Skip to content

refactor(git): Enhance PR creation and commit handling #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 8, 2024

Conversation

j2nullify
Copy link
Owner

@j2nullify j2nullify commented Aug 8, 2024

Enhance Git Commit and Pull Request Workflow

This PR introduces several improvements to our Git commit and pull request creation process:

  1. Commit Message Handling:

    • Added fallback to use the default commit message if the user input is empty.
    • Improved error handling for failed commits.
  2. Pull Request Creation:

    • Implemented automatic upstream branch setting during push.
    • Added functionality to generate PR diff for better context.
    • Integrated Bedrock API for generating PR titles and descriptions based on the diff.
    • Improved error handling and feedback for PR creation process.
  3. Bedrock API Integration:

    • Updated query_bedrock function to print streaming responses in real-time.

These changes aim to streamline our Git workflow, provide more informative commit messages and PR descriptions, and improve the overall developer experience.

- Update make_pull_request.py to use query_bedrock instead of query_ollama
- Rename main function from make_pull_request to main
- Adjust imports to reflect new module structure
- app/commit.py: Handle empty commit messages
- app/make_pull_request.py: Enhance PR creation with diff-based content
- app/query_bedrock.py: Add real-time output for streamed responses
@j2nullify j2nullify changed the title Here are some example pull request titles for a feature branch: "Add user authentication with JWT tokens" "Implement shopping cart functionality" "Optimize database queries for improved performance" "Integrate Stripe payment gateway" "Add export to CSV feature for reports" "Refactor user profile page using React components" "Fix mobile responsiveness issues on checkout page" "Implement real-time notifications using WebSockets" "Add multi-language support" "Create admin dashboard for managing users and content" The ideal pull request title should be concise (usually under 10 words) while clearly conveying the main purpose or feature being added. It should give reviewers a quick understanding of what the changes accomplish. Based on the provided diff, here's a concise and informative pull request title: "Improve commit process and implement PR creation with Bedrock integration" Aug 8, 2024
# Push the branch to remote
subprocess.run(["git", "push"])
# Get the current branch name
current_branch = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "--abbrev-ref", "HEAD"]).decode().strip()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nullify Code Language: Python 🔵 MEDIUM Severity CWE-78

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

The vulnerability, 'Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command', occurs when user input or variable data isn't properly sanitized before being used in a system command. This can lead to executing unintended commands or passing invalid data to the system. In the provided code snippet, the output of a Git command is being fetched without ensuring that it doesn't contain malicious modifications. Although the current usage context in the snippet itself might seem benign, using unsanitized outputs further in the application can introduce serious security risks.

How this could be exploited:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting special characters or command sequences into the Git repository's branch names. When the application fetches the current branch name, these injections could result in the execution of unintended commands on the system where the script runs. For example, creating a branch named 'master; rm -rf /' could potentially lead to the execution of a harmful command along with the intended Git command.

Read more:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

Reply with /nullify to interact with me like another developer
(you will need to refresh the page for updates)

current_branch = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "--abbrev-ref", "HEAD"]).decode().strip()

# Set the upstream to origin and push the current branch
subprocess.run(["git", "push", "--set-upstream", "origin", current_branch])

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nullify Code Language: Python 🔵 MEDIUM Severity CWE-78

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

The vulnerability 'Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command' occurs when an application does not properly sanitize input that is passed to the operating system. This can lead to command injection, where an attacker can control the command that is executed on the operating system. In the provided code snippet, the variable 'current_branch' is being used to dynamically create the command that is passed to the 'subprocess.run' method. If 'current_branch' comes from an unreliable source, or if it's manipulable by an external user without proper validation and sanitization, it could lead to a security risk.

How this could be exploited:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting special characters or command operators into the 'current_branch' variable. For example, setting 'current_branch' to a value like '; rm -rf /' could result in the deletion of the server's root directory if the script is executed with sufficient permissions, leading to catastrophic data loss and system failure.

Read more:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

Reply with /nullify to interact with me like another developer
(you will need to refresh the page for updates)

@j2nullify-nullify
Copy link

j2nullify-nullify bot commented Aug 8, 2024

Nullify Code Vulnerabilities

5 findings found in this pull request

🔴 CRITICAL 🟡 HIGH 🔵 MEDIUM ⚪ LOW
0 0 5 0

You can find a list of all findings here

…leanup

- Update prompt for PR title generation to include format instructions
- Remove unused return statement in main function
@j2nullify j2nullify changed the title Based on the provided diff, here's a concise and informative pull request title: "Improve commit process and implement PR creation with Bedrock integration" refactor(git): Enhance PR creation and commit handling Aug 8, 2024
@j2nullify j2nullify merged commit c5a447b into main Aug 8, 2024
2 checks passed
def make_pull_request():
def get_pr_diff():
try:
diff = subprocess.check_output(["git", "diff", "origin/main...HEAD"]).decode()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nullify Code Language: Python 🔵 MEDIUM Severity CWE-78

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

The vulnerability, 'Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command', often referred to as 'OS command injection', occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize input that is passed to system commands. In the given code snippet, the application is executing a Git command using user-supplied input without validating or encoding it to ensure it is safe. This makes it possible for an attacker to inject malicious commands.

How this could be exploited:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the input to execute unintended system commands. For instance, if an attacker can influence the git branches or parameters being input into the 'git diff' command, they might append a semicolon to the end of a branch name followed by any malicious command they wish to run. This could allow the attacker to execute potentially harmful commands on the system.

Read more:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

Here's how you might fix this potential vulnerability

The modified code adds exception handling for the subprocess calls. If a subprocess call fails, the CalledProcessError exception is caught and an error message is printed. The function then returns None to indicate that an error occurred. This prevents the program from crashing if a subprocess call fails. The subprocess.run() calls now include the check=True argument, which causes an exception to be raised if the command returns a non-zero exit status.

Please note that AI auto-fixes are currently experimental

Add exception handling for subprocess calls

Suggested change
diff = subprocess.check_output(["git", "diff", "origin/main...HEAD"]).decode()
try:
diff = subprocess.check_output(["git", "diff", "origin/main...HEAD"]).decode()
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print(f"Error: {str(e)}")
return None

Add exception handling for subprocess calls
Line 16

        try:
            current_branch = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "--abbrev-ref", "HEAD"]).decode().strip()
        except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
            print(f"Error: {str(e)}")
            return None

Add exception handling for subprocess calls
Line 19

        try:
            subprocess.run(["git", "push", "--set-upstream", "origin", current_branch], check=True)
        except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
            print(f"Error: {str(e)}")
            return None

Add exception handling for subprocess calls
Line 49

        try:
            result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "create", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description], check=True)
        except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
            print(f"Error: {str(e)}")
            return None

Add exception handling for subprocess calls
Line 51

        try:
            result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "edit", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description], check=True)
        except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
            print(f"Error: {str(e)}")
            return None

Powered by nullify.ai

Reply with /nullify to interact with me like another developer
(you will need to refresh the page for updates)

# Push the branch to remote
subprocess.run(["git", "push"])
# Get the current branch name
current_branch = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "--abbrev-ref", "HEAD"]).decode().strip()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nullify Code Language: Python 🔵 MEDIUM Severity CWE-78

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

This code vulnerability, known as 'Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command', occurs when input data is not properly sanitized before being used in operating system commands. In this snippet, the code is using the Python 'subprocess' module to execute a 'git' command, which retrieves the current Git branch. However, if the output of the command includes special characters or unintended commands, it could potentially lead to the execution of arbitrary commands on the operating system.

How this could be exploited:
An attacker could exploit this by manipulating the Git branch name to include special OS command elements. For example, if an attacker creates a branch named 'master; rm -rf /', and the code does not properly neutralize the special characters, the 'rm -rf /' command could be executed unintentionally, leading to deletion of files.

Read more:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

Reply with /nullify to interact with me like another developer
(you will need to refresh the page for updates)

current_branch = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "--abbrev-ref", "HEAD"]).decode().strip()

# Set the upstream to origin and push the current branch
subprocess.run(["git", "push", "--set-upstream", "origin", current_branch])

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nullify Code Language: Python 🔵 MEDIUM Severity CWE-78

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

The vulnerability 'Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command' arises when input data isn't correctly sanitized before being passed to an operating system command. In simpler terms, if the data that a user or another part of the application provides contains special characters or command operators, these might be interpreted by the operating system as instructions, rather than plain data. In the provided code snippet, the variable 'current_branch' is included directly in a system command that utilizes the 'subprocess.run' function to execute a 'git push' command. If 'current_branch' contains any special characters or unintended command sequences, these will be executed by the shell, leading to potential malicious operations.

How this could be exploited:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the 'current_branch' variable to include additional shell commands. For example, if an attacker manages to set 'current_branch' to '; rm -rf /', this would translate the command to 'git push --set-upstream origin; rm -rf /', which would execute a destructive 'remove' command on the root directory of the server, likely causing significant damage or data loss.

Read more:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

Reply with /nullify to interact with me like another developer
(you will need to refresh the page for updates)

@@ -30,7 +45,17 @@ def make_pull_request():
return

# If gh is installed, proceed with creating the pull request
subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "create", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])

result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "create", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nullify Code Language: Python 🔵 MEDIUM Severity CWE-78

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

The vulnerability identified is 'Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command,' often referred to as command injection. This occurs when input data containing special characters or commands is fed directly into system-level command execution without proper sanitization. In the provided code example, variables 'pr_title' and 'pr_description' are included directly in a command that creates a pull request via the GitHub CLI ('gh'). If these variables are taken from user inputs and not properly sanitized, they may include malicious commands that could be executed on the operating system.

How this could be exploited:
An attacker could exploit this by crafting a pull request title or description that includes OS command injections. For example, if an attacker uses a pr_title like 'Update; rm -rf /', it could lead to the deletion of files or directories on the server (depending on permissions), when the script is executed.

Read more:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

Reply with /nullify to interact with me like another developer
(you will need to refresh the page for updates)


result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "create", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])
if result.returncode != 0:
result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "edit", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nullify Code Language: Python 🔵 MEDIUM Severity CWE-78

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

The vulnerability identified, known as 'Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command' or 'Command Injection', occurs when user-supplied input (variables like pr_title or pr_description) is not properly sanitized before being included in operating system commands. Here, the code directly incorporates inputs pr_title and pr_description into the OS command to edit a pull request. If these inputs aren't properly validated or sanitized, they could be crafted to execute unintended additional commands alongside the intended ones.

How this could be exploited:
An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by embedding special command-separated characters in the pr_title or pr_description inputs. For example, setting pr_description to 'Valid description here && delete_all_files' would lead to the deletion of all files (implicitly executed by the command) if the code does not sanitize this input. This, in turn, triggers the additional dangerous command hidden within the legitimate command.

Read more:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

Reply with /nullify to interact with me like another developer
(you will need to refresh the page for updates)

Comment on lines +57 to +59
result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "create", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])
if result.returncode != 0:
result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "edit", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nullify Code Language: Python 🔵 MEDIUM Severity CWE-78

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

The identified vulnerability 'Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command' occurs when input data isn't properly sanitized before being used in an operating system command. This can allow attackers to inject unintended commands to be executed by the system. In the provided code, 'pr_title' and 'pr_description' are included as parameters to a command line operation without ensuring they are safe to employ. This implies that if the pull request title or description contains malicious command sequences, they might be executed.

How this could be exploited:
An example exploitation could occur if an attacker inputs specially crafted text into either 'pr_title' or 'pr_description' that includes shell control characters or commands. For instance, if the title is crafted like 'Valid Title; rm -rf /', this would not only set the title but also attempt to delete all files on the server running this script, if it has sufficient permissions.

Read more:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

Here's how you might fix this potential vulnerability

The modified code mitigates this vulnerability by escaping any special characters in the pr_title and pr_description using the shlex.quote function. This ensures that these inputs are treated as literal strings by the shell and not interpreted as part of the command.

Please note that AI auto-fixes are currently experimental

Escape special characters in pr_title and pr_description

Suggested change
result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "create", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])
if result.returncode != 0:
result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "edit", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])
import shlex
pr_title = shlex.quote(pr_title)
pr_description = shlex.quote(pr_description)
result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "create", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])
if result.returncode != 0:
result = subprocess.run(["gh", "pr", "edit", "--title", pr_title, "--body", pr_description])

Powered by nullify.ai

Reply with /nullify to interact with me like another developer
(you will need to refresh the page for updates)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant