Skip to content

Conversation

@freinold
Copy link
Member

@freinold freinold commented Oct 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation
    • Added architectural documentation describing a two-way ticket processing workflow incorporating AI assistance, including triage, automated responses, semi-automated draft reviews, and manual routing based on confidence levels.

@freinold freinold self-assigned this Oct 27, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Walkthrough

Two ADR (Architecture Decision Record) documents are updated: a new ADR 02 describing a two-way processing workflow for AI-assisted ticket handling is created, and the ADR index is updated to include it. Both changes are documentation-only with no code modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
ADR documentation
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md, docs/adr/index.md
New ADR 02 document added describing two-way processing approach for tickets with triage, automated responses, draft responses with review, and manual routing; ADR index updated with link to new document

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Documentation additions only; no code logic or structural changes
  • Straightforward index update linking to new ADR document

Poem

🐰 A new path for tickets, two-way we say,
Triage and drafts guide the AI's way,
From fully automated to careful review,
Architecture decisions emerge, bold and true! 🎫✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "adr: structure processing in 2 ways" is directly related to the main change in the pull request. The changeset adds a new ADR (Architecture Decision Record) document titled "ADR 02: Two-way processing of tickets" and updates the ADR index to reference it. The title accurately reflects that this PR is about an ADR (adr: prefix) concerning a two-way processing approach. While the phrasing "structure processing" could arguably be more explicit (e.g., "add adr" or "document two-way ticket processing"), the title is sufficiently clear and specific enough for a developer scanning the repository history to understand that this PR introduces documentation for a two-way processing decision.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch adr-2way-processing

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md (1)

17-19: Reduce repetitive phrasing for clarity.

Lines 17–18 use "we want to" twice in successive sentences. Rephrase for variety:

- On the one side, we want to operate as automated as possible and send responses directly to customers.
- On the other side, we want to be sure we don't send wrong or inappropriate responses.
+ On the one side, we want to operate as automated as possible and send responses directly to customers.
+ On the other side, we must ensure we don't send wrong or inappropriate responses.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 009d6ae and 30b19e1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • docs/adr/2way_processing.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • docs/sketch/2way_processing.excalidraw is excluded by !**/*.excalidraw
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/adr/index.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md

[style] ~18-~18: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...tly to customers. On the other side, we want to be sure we don't send wrong or inapprop...

(REP_WANT_TO_VB)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md

22-22: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md (3)

36-36: Verify that the diagram file exists.

Line 36 references a diagram file 2way_processing.png. Ensure this file is committed to the repository or provide clarification on whether it's a placeholder to be added in a follow-up commit.


1-35: ADR structure is clear and well-organized.

The document follows the MADR template appropriately, with clear metadata, context, and a well-articulated proposed workflow. The four processing paths (triage → fully automated, semi-automated, manual, or escalation) are logically sound and address the stated problem of balancing automation with safety. The optional mechanism for auto-sending known-safe responses after performance evaluation is a pragmatic addition.


38-40: "Decision Made" section intentionally left for later.

The decision section is marked "tbd", which is appropriate for a proposed ADR. Ensure this section is filled in during acceptance or after consensus is reached.

docs/adr/index.md (1)

9-9: Index entry is properly formatted.

The new ADR 02 entry follows the established convention and is correctly positioned in the list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants