-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 0
adr: structure processing in 2 ways #24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughTwo ADR (Architecture Decision Record) documents are updated: a new ADR 02 describing a two-way processing workflow for AI-assisted ticket handling is created, and the ADR index is updated to include it. Both changes are documentation-only with no code modifications. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md (1)
17-19: Reduce repetitive phrasing for clarity.Lines 17–18 use "we want to" twice in successive sentences. Rephrase for variety:
- On the one side, we want to operate as automated as possible and send responses directly to customers. - On the other side, we want to be sure we don't send wrong or inappropriate responses. + On the one side, we want to operate as automated as possible and send responses directly to customers. + On the other side, we must ensure we don't send wrong or inappropriate responses.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docs/adr/2way_processing.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdocs/sketch/2way_processing.excalidrawis excluded by!**/*.excalidraw
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md(1 hunks)docs/adr/index.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md
[style] ~18-~18: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...tly to customers. On the other side, we want to be sure we don't send wrong or inapprop...
(REP_WANT_TO_VB)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md
22-22: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/adr/02-two-way-processing-of-tickets.md (3)
36-36: Verify that the diagram file exists.Line 36 references a diagram file
2way_processing.png. Ensure this file is committed to the repository or provide clarification on whether it's a placeholder to be added in a follow-up commit.
1-35: ADR structure is clear and well-organized.The document follows the MADR template appropriately, with clear metadata, context, and a well-articulated proposed workflow. The four processing paths (triage → fully automated, semi-automated, manual, or escalation) are logically sound and address the stated problem of balancing automation with safety. The optional mechanism for auto-sending known-safe responses after performance evaluation is a pragmatic addition.
38-40: "Decision Made" section intentionally left for later.The decision section is marked "tbd", which is appropriate for a proposed ADR. Ensure this section is filled in during acceptance or after consensus is reached.
docs/adr/index.md (1)
9-9: Index entry is properly formatted.The new ADR 02 entry follows the established convention and is correctly positioned in the list.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes