Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Include Class Coverage #36

Open
irongut opened this issue Feb 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Include Class Coverage #36

irongut opened this issue Feb 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@irongut
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Parsing An issue reletad to parsing the coverage xml. Summary An issue related to creating the code coverage summary.
Milestone
vNext+1

Comments

@irongut
Copy link
Owner

irongut commented Feb 19, 2022

Feature Request

Class coverage metrics are included in the data, include them in the ouput.

Expected Behaviour

Include class metrics in the output, perhaps if a verbose mode flag is set.

Formats for text and markdown output tbd.

Additional Context

Collapsed sections might be good for markdown output.

Linked To
@irongut irongut added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 19, 2022
@irongut irongut self-assigned this Feb 19, 2022
@irongut irongut added Parsing An issue reletad to parsing the coverage xml. Summary An issue related to creating the code coverage summary. labels Feb 19, 2022
@irongut irongut added this to the vNext+1 milestone Feb 19, 2022
@irongut irongut modified the milestones: vNext, vNext+1 Feb 27, 2022
@codepunkt
Copy link

This would be amazing!

@bkagan98
Copy link

bkagan98 commented Feb 3, 2023

This would be very helpful feature. Any ETA?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@irongut irongut

Labels
enhancement New feature or request Parsing An issue reletad to parsing the coverage xml. Summary An issue related to creating the code coverage summary.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
vNext+1
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@codepunkt @irongut @bkagan98