List other Kubo RPC API clients

[BigLep]

After #1185 , we should update the equivalent of https://docs.ipfs.io/reference/http/api/ to highlight that there are other implementations.

Language	Client library	Status
Go	https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs-api	Active
Java	https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/java-ipfs-http-client	Active
JavaScript	https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs/tree/master/packages/ipfs-http-client	Active
Python	https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/py-ipfs-http-client	Active
Scala	https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/scala-ipfs-api	Inactive
Clojure	https://github.com/keorn/clj-ipfs-http-client	Active
Clojurescript	https://github.com/district0x/cljs-ipfs-http-client	Active
Haskell	https://github.com/davidar/hs-ipfs-api	Inactive
Swift	https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/swift-ipfs-http-client	Active
CommonLisp	https://github.com/WeMeetAgain/cl-ipfs-api	Inactive
Rust	https://github.com/ferristseng/rust-ipfs-api	Active
	https://github.com/gkbrk/rust-ipfs-api	Inactive
	https://github.com/rmnoff/rust-ipfs-api	Inactive
	https://github.com/rschulman/rust-ipfs-api	Inactive
Ruby	https://github.com/Fryie/ipfs-ruby	Inactive
	https://github.com/tbenett/ruby-ipfs-http-client	Active
Mac Automator	https://github.com/NeoTeo/ipfs-osx-service	Inactive
Pharo	https://github.com/khinsen/ipfs-pharo	Active
PHP	https://github.com/cloutier/php-ipfs-api	Inactive
	https://github.com/digitalkaoz/php-ipfs-api	Inactive
C#	https://github.com/jeremy-ellis-tech/net-ipfs-http-client	Inactive
	https://github.com/richardschneider/net-ipfs-http-client	Active
C++	https://github.com/vasild/cpp-ipfs-api	Active
Erlang	https://github.com/hendry19901990/erlang-ipfs-http-client	Inactive

This list was grabbed from https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs/tree/cleanup/root-readme#http-client-libraries

[lidel]

Adding a note that we want to tackle this AFTER we clean up and rename GO and JS libraries, tracked in:

• go-kubo-rpc-client (Point users at canonical kubo/client/rpc library kubo#9124)
• js-kubo-rpc-client (Create js-kubo-rpc-client library kubo#9125)

[siiky]

I had this from a while back: ipfs/ipfs#480

Should I open a PR here instead?

[ElPaisano]

Hello @BigLep checking in if this is ready to be worked on? Looking at the clean up that lidel notes above, probably not?

[BigLep]

@ElPaisano : it's true that ipfs/kubo#9142 isn't completed. This will likely take a month or so.

@lidel : that said, I wonder if we should get this docs page started so folks like @siiky and @ElPaisano can contribute any Kubo RPC clients they have. Do you think we need to hold off ont his until ipfs/kubo#9142 is completed?