Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OKR updates: Create specs for addressing on the Decentralized Web #69

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2018
Merged

OKR updates: Create specs for addressing on the Decentralized Web #69

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2018

Conversation

lidel
Copy link
Member

@lidel lidel commented Jan 8, 2018 •
edited
Loading

  • added references to already existing issues
  • added Detect IPFS Desktop and Provide Additional Node Controls ipfs-companion#350 as a KR: I feel this communication channel is an important part of "solid foundation for browser integration(s) going forward"
  • added ipfs:// – even tho it is a "short term hack", we should document use cases and expectations around it, otherwise people will build things that use ipfs://ipfs/Qmfoo instead of ipfs://Qmfoo

@ghost ghost assigned lidel Jan 8, 2018
@ghost ghost added the status/in-progress In progress label Jan 8, 2018
lidel
lidel commented Jan 8, 2018
View reviewed changes
OKR.md Outdated
@@ -33,4 +34,5 @@ Quarterly statement of OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) for the "IPFS in Web Br
**Structure documentation and discussion around the primary Browser vendor concerns:**

- `dweb:` proposal is documented
Copy link
Member Author

@lidel lidel Jan 8, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note to self: @lgierth created an good outline for this (ipfs/specs#167)

olizilla
olizilla reviewed Jan 8, 2018
View reviewed changes
OKR.md Outdated
@@ -33,4 +34,5 @@ Quarterly statement of OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) for the "IPFS in Web Br
**Structure documentation and discussion around the primary Browser vendor concerns:**

- `dweb:` proposal is documented
- `ipfs://` (short term URL-based solution) is documented
Copy link
Member

@olizilla olizilla Jan 8, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good stuff @lidel.

short term URL-based solution

Avoid short term. I think the idea is that all the proposed address forms are legitimate, and will be supported.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point, reorganized in 35dc0ce

@lidel lidel changed the title OKR updates OKR updates: Create specs for addressing on the Decentralized Web Jan 8, 2018
@lidel lidel merged commit 8f59358 into master Jan 8, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the status/in-progress In progress label Jan 8, 2018
@lidel lidel deleted the companion-okrs branch January 8, 2018 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@olizilla olizilla olizilla left review comments

@daviddias daviddias Awaiting requested review from daviddias

Assignees

@lidel lidel

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@lidel @olizilla