You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my opinion it would be nice(r) if the dep files had the same base name as the corresponding VHDL files. This is already the case for most of the existing dep files for the IPBus slaves, except for the one corresponding to ipbus_syncreg_v.vhdl, which is called simply syncreg_v.dep.
NOTE: This dep file is already included in several places, of course. In order to make the transition smoother (?) one could rename the file and add a symlink with the original name, maybe?
Cheers,
Jeroen
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well spotted, thanks!
The dep file should (and will eventually) be renamed to match the dep file. The only slight hiccup is that this change will break almost every existing ipbus-based design, but such is life.
Regarding syncreg_{r,w}.vhd, not necessarily. Those 2 entities are not ipbus specific and that is why they don't have the ipbus_ prefix at the moment. This might change in the future, as we're discussing how to handle these cases
Hi,
In my opinion it would be nice(r) if the dep files had the same base name as the corresponding VHDL files. This is already the case for most of the existing dep files for the IPBus slaves, except for the one corresponding to ipbus_syncreg_v.vhdl, which is called simply syncreg_v.dep.
NOTE: This dep file is already included in several places, of course. In order to make the transition smoother (?) one could rename the file and add a symlink with the original name, maybe?
Cheers,
Jeroen
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: