Skip to content

Conversation

VorobyevIlya
Copy link
Contributor

@VorobyevIlya VorobyevIlya commented Oct 6, 2025

Description of change

PR adds eviction for recent_shards and makes some refactoring of evicting headers.

Links to any relevant issues

How the change has been tested

  • Basic tests (linting, compilation, formatting, unit/integration tests)
  • Patch-specific tests (correctness, functionality coverage)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have checked that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@VorobyevIlya VorobyevIlya self-assigned this Oct 6, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

6 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
apps-backend Ignored Ignored Oct 6, 2025 7:49pm
apps-ui-kit Ignored Ignored Oct 6, 2025 7:49pm
iota-evm-bridge Ignored Ignored Oct 6, 2025 7:49pm
iota-multisig-toolkit Ignored Ignored Oct 6, 2025 7:49pm
rebased-explorer Ignored Ignored Oct 6, 2025 7:49pm
wallet-dashboard Ignored Ignored Oct 6, 2025 7:49pm

@iota-ci iota-ci added consensus Issues related to the Core Consensus team core-protocol labels Oct 6, 2025
@VorobyevIlya VorobyevIlya changed the title evict shards feat(starfish): evict shards Oct 6, 2025
@VorobyevIlya VorobyevIlya marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2025 09:23
@VorobyevIlya VorobyevIlya requested a review from a team as a code owner October 7, 2025 09:23
@VorobyevIlya VorobyevIlya requested a review from a team October 7, 2025 12:19
@VorobyevIlya VorobyevIlya merged commit 3d7adee into develop Oct 7, 2025
58 of 62 checks passed
@VorobyevIlya VorobyevIlya deleted the consensus/feat/starfish/evict-shards branch October 7, 2025 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

consensus Issues related to the Core Consensus team core-protocol

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants