changing RA for archive history - #178
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
LGTM!
Agreed. We don't need all those. BTW, can you add the line |
Contributor
Author
|
This should be good now. @ocefpaf please merge when ready. |
Member
Let me solve that merge conflict and we'll merge it. Hold on... |
Contributor
Author
NANOOS has more data and makes a nicer plot
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NANOOS has more data and makes a nicer plot.
We might want to clean up the print statements in cell [7] as they print a lot of content, bloating the webpage.