Description
Please verify that this bug has NOT been raised before.
- I checked and didn't find a similar issue
Describe the bug*
Linking barcodes via purchase order from DigiKey (Receive line item button) leads to following error:
Barcode matches existing item
While checking already linked barcode identifiers via admin panel I have found out server responds with:
{
"stockitem": {
"pk": 54,
"api_url": "/api/stock/54/",
"web_url": "/stock/item/54/"
},
"plugin": "InvenTreeBarcode",
"barcode_data": "[)>\u001e06\u001dP182\u001d1PS3B-PH-K-S\u001d30P455-1720-ND\u001dK\u001d1K87684816\u001d10K105867004\u001d9D2022-05\u001d1TS30784-17\u001d11K1\u001d4LMY\u001dQ2\u001d11ZPICK\u001d12Z926627\u001d13Z999999\u001d20Z00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\u001e\u0004",
"barcode_hash": "41426d2aeca6432f71b14960f7a9fee5",
"success": "Match found for barcode data"
}
41426d2aeca6432f71b14960f7a9fee5 belongs to existing stock component.
But... I can receive item without linking barcode, and then I can link the same barcode to the same component which I just received via Stock tab, and it shows barcode identifier as 328370653459f52c520d85e49d3737b7.
Surprisingly, seems like I cannot reproduce this bug on demo site, but there's a chance I haven't followed that exact sequence? Or maybe DigiKey plugin is configured?
Steps to Reproduce
Following plugin is enabled: Supplier Integration - DigiKey
Plugin has configured Supplier which points to DigiKey.
Just try to link barcodes to two different components (from the same order?) received from DigiKey.
Expected behaviour
InvenTree treats DigiKey barcodes as unique and successfully links to different stock components.
Deployment Method
- Docker
- Package
- Bare metal
- Other - added info in Steps to Reproduce
Version Information
Version Information:
InvenTree-Version: 0.15.5
Django Version: 4.2.14
Commit Hash: cc45357
Commit Date: 2024-07-12
Database: sqlite3
Debug-Mode: False
Deployed using Docker: True
Platform: Linux-3.10.108-x86_64-with
Installer: DOC
Please verify if you can reproduce this bug on the demo site.
- I can reproduce this bug on the demo site.
Relevant log output
Component 1:
Hash: `41426d2aeca6432f71b14960f7a9fee5`
Data:
{
"BarcodeFormat": 134217728,
"BarcodeFormatString": "DATAMATRIX",
"BarcodeFormat_2": 0,
"BarcodeFormatString_2": "No Barcode Format in group 2",
"BarcodeText": "[)>\u001e06\u001dP182\u001d1PS3B-PH-K-S\u001d30P455-1720-ND\u001dK\u001d1K87684816\u001d10K105867004\u001d9D2022-05\u001d1TS30784-17\u001d11K1\u001d4LMY\u001dQ2\u001d11ZPICK\u001d12Z926627\u001d13Z999999\u001d20Z00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\u001e\u0004",
"BarcodeBytes": "5b 29 3e 1e 30 36 1d 50 31 38 32 1d 31 50 53 33 42 2d 50 48 2d 4b 2d 53 1d 33 30 50 34 35 35 2d 31 37 32 30 2d 4e 44 1d 4b 1d 31 4b 38 37 36 38 34 38 31 36 1d 31 30 4b 31 30 35 38 36 37 30 30 34 1d 39 44 32 30 32 32 2d 30 35 1d 31 54 53 33 30 37 38 34 2d 31 37 1d 31 31 4b 31 1d 34 4c 4d 59 1d 51 32 1d 31 31 5a 50 49 43 4b 1d 31 32 5a 39 32 36 36 32 37 1d 31 33 5a 39 39 39 39 39 39 1d 32 30 5a 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 1e 04",
"LocalizationResult": {
"TerminatePhase": 32,
"BarcodeFormat": 134217728,
"BarcodeFormatString": "DATAMATRIX",
"BarcodeFormat_2": 0,
"BarcodeFormatString_2": "No Barcode Format in group 2",
"Angle": 0,
"ResultPoints": [
"520, 297",
"647, 298",
"646, 424",
"519, 423"
],
"ModuleSize": 3,
"PageNumber": 0,
"RegionName": "",
"DocumentName": null,
"ResultCoordinateType": 1,
"AccompanyingTextBytes": null,
"Confidence": 89,
"TransformationMatrix": [
1,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
1
]
},
"Exception": null,
"IsDPM": 0,
"IsMirrored": 0
}Component 2:
Hash: 328370653459f52c520d85e49d3737b7
Data:
{
"BarcodeFormat": 134217728,
"BarcodeFormatString": "DATAMATRIX",
"BarcodeFormat_2": 0,
"BarcodeFormatString_2": "No Barcode Format in group 2",
"BarcodeText": "[)>\u001e06\u001dP138\u001d1PFCR684208T\u001d30P4654-FCR684208T-ND\u001dK\u001d1K87684816\u001d10K105867004\u001d9D2340\u001d1TC093580\u001d11K1\u001d4LGB\u001dQ1\u001d11ZPICK\u001d12Z19110233\u001d13Z999999\u001d20Z0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\u001e\u0004",
"BarcodeBytes": "5b 29 3e 1e 30 36 1d 50 31 33 38 1d 31 50 46 43 52 36 38 34 32 30 38 54 1d 33 30 50 34 36 35 34 2d 46 43 52 36 38 34 32 30 38 54 2d 4e 44 1d 4b 1d 31 4b 38 37 36 38 34 38 31 36 1d 31 30 4b 31 30 35 38 36 37 30 30 34 1d 39 44 32 33 34 30 1d 31 54 43 30 39 33 35 38 30 1d 31 31 4b 31 1d 34 4c 47 42 1d 51 31 1d 31 31 5a 50 49 43 4b 1d 31 32 5a 31 39 31 31 30 32 33 33 1d 31 33 5a 39 39 39 39 39 39 1d 32 30 5a 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 1e 04",
"LocalizationResult": {
"TerminatePhase": 32,
"BarcodeFormat": 134217728,
"BarcodeFormatString": "DATAMATRIX",
"BarcodeFormat_2": 0,
"BarcodeFormatString_2": "No Barcode Format in group 2",
"Angle": 0,
"ResultPoints": [
"486, 279",
"646, 276",
"645, 443",
"486, 441"
],
"ModuleSize": 3,
"PageNumber": 0,
"RegionName": "",
"DocumentName": null,
"ResultCoordinateType": 1,
"AccompanyingTextBytes": null,
"Confidence": 93,
"TransformationMatrix": [
1,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
1
]
},
"Exception": null,
"IsDPM": 0,
"IsMirrored": 0
}