Skip to content

[SYCL] Add buffer container constructor and CTAD #773

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 15, 2019

Conversation

rolandschulz
Copy link
Contributor

Prototype of a proposal to add a buffer constructor which takes a contiguous buffer as an argument to simplify usage and add buffer deduction guides for both iterator and container.

@rolandschulz rolandschulz force-pushed the buffer_container_ctad branch from ddf4392 to b50f3d5 Compare November 2, 2019 00:28
Copy link
Contributor

@keryell keryell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! :-)

@rolandschulz rolandschulz force-pushed the buffer_container_ctad branch 2 times, most recently from 1197022 to 01d33e0 Compare November 6, 2019 00:07
keryell
keryell previously approved these changes Nov 6, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@keryell keryell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks like good features in a modern C++ context.

bader
bader previously approved these changes Nov 10, 2019
@bader bader changed the title Add buffer container constructor and CTAD [SYCL] Add buffer container constructor and CTAD Nov 11, 2019
@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Nov 15, 2019

@rolandschulz, there are unresolved comments, but I'm not sure if we expect any changes in the code.
Are you going to apply suggestions from @romanovvlad?

@rolandschulz rolandschulz dismissed stale reviews from bader and keryell via 7534dad November 15, 2019 10:04
Prototype of a proposal to add a buffer constructor which takes
a contiguous buffer as an argument to simplify usage.

Signed-off-by: Roland Schulz <roland.schulz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Schulz <roland.schulz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Schulz <roland.schulz@intel.com>
@rolandschulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rolandschulz, there are unresolved comments, but I'm not sure if we expect any changes in the code.
Are you going to apply suggestions from @romanovvlad?

Sorry forgot about the one comment. Done. Also rebased.

@bader bader requested a review from romanovvlad November 15, 2019 10:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants