-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 769
[SYCL][CUDA][HIP][PI] Fix barrier #6490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f26d6aa
fixed barrier
t4c1 8228e30
Merge branch 'sycl' into fix_barrier
t4c1 ee10465
added hip chenges
t4c1 ae97b36
bugfix HIP implementation
t4c1 f1a3ad5
format
t4c1 e30c582
remove accidental changes to CMake
t4c1 9b825bc
Merge branch 'sycl' into fix_barrier
t4c1 7e31805
Merge branch 'sycl' into fix_barrier
t4c1 5cb944e
add comments about how barrier now works
t4c1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to check if the barrier event has finished prior to this so we can potentially clear it and skip the cuStreamWaitEvent call?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are proposing an additional CUDA API call for potentially every operation that might let us eliminate additional calls in the future. Whether this makes sense to do or not depends on whether we expect most streams will have work enqueued to them before or after all the work before the barrier is finished. If the answer is before, the current code will be more performant. If the answer is after, we want to do what you suggest.
My gut feeling says current implementation will be better for most use cases. However the reasoning from the previous paragraph assumes that
cuStreamWaitEvent
andcuEventQuery
take roughly the same time. Looking into that could give us more information that could inform this decision. However, for now I would leave this as it is.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, this is potentially more work up-front, though I would expect
cuEventQuery
to be somewhat lightweight, but doing some benchmarking for it may make sense before a final decision is made on this. I am okay to keep as-is. 😄