Skip to content

[CI] Enable pr-code-format workflow for intel/llvm repo #12184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

aelovikov-intel
Copy link
Contributor

To experiment with the suggestion in #12085.
Note that pull_request_target means we cannot test this before we merge it.

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel requested a review from a team as a code owner December 14, 2023 23:48
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ permissions:
jobs:
code_formatter:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd like to start with ubuntu-latest and see how that would work.

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel merged commit 43adc8a into intel:sycl Dec 18, 2023
@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel deleted the ci-format branch December 18, 2023 16:46
aelovikov-intel added a commit to aelovikov-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
intel#12184 enable format check for python
files but we never properly formatted them. Do it now.
steffenlarsen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2024
#12184 enable format check for python
files but we never properly formatted them. Do it now.
aelovikov-intel added a commit to aelovikov-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
We've enabled the upstream community workflow in
intel#12184 after discussion in
intel#12085. It's been doing just
fine, so the old can be removed now.

We now start the build/tests before format checks are finished, but that
shouldn't be a problem thanks to intel#11941.
aelovikov-intel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
We've enabled the upstream community workflow in
#12184 after discussion in
#12085. It's been doing just
fine, so the old can be removed now.

We now start the build/tests before format checks are finished, but that
shouldn't be a problem thanks to
#11941.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant