Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Use single reusable workflow for E2E tests on Linux #10292

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

aelovikov-intel
Copy link
Contributor

The workflow will be shared between normal "Build + E2E" and "E2E on Nightly" tasks.

The workflow will be shared between normal "Build + E2E" and "E2E on Nightly"
tasks.
@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2023 21:49
@aelovikov-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

extra_cmake_args: ${{ matrix.extra_cmake_args }}
extra_image_opts: ${{ matrix.extra_image_opts }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we using extra_image_opts someplace else? I thought -u 1001 was required for some reason that I can't remember ( same user as when containers are created? )

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved offline.

Copy link
Contributor

@cperkinsintel cperkinsintel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good. I had a question about extra_cmake_opts ( as opposed to extra_cmake_args ), but if that's no issue, then proceed.

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel merged commit 377ce24 into sycl Jul 11, 2023
15 checks passed
@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel deleted the sycl-devops-pr/e2e-refactor branch July 11, 2023 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants