BibFormat: add techreport as bibtex entry

[tsgit]

This recognizes 980__a:techreport and sets entry_type accordingly. Currently INSPIRE doesn't have any records marked as techreports, so this is just for code completeness.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Schwander thorsten.schwander@gmail.com

[tsgit]

@michamos as per standup discussion

[michamos]

I am not sure that's the way to go, as in the schema possible document types have been standardized here and here.
I think we should rather decide whether 980__a:report == @techreport, and adapt the bibtex format accordingly. I don't have strong opinions on this, nor did anyone on standup apparently.

[tsgit]

fine with me if it ever comes to that, by it didn't sound like "report" was considered equivalent to "techreport".
so this patch simply ensures that the code is clear about where in the code/when/how a techreport entry_type would be selected without actually changing anything for existing data.

as it is, nowhere in the code would entry_type techreport be assigned and so the conditional switches on techreport are somewhat misleading

[annetteholtkamp]

Currently, the large majority of our Reports are TDRs. But we also have records like Status Report of the DPHEP Collaboration: A Global Effort for Sustainable Data Preservation in High Energy Physics<https://inspirehep.net/record/1408514> DPHEP<https://inspirehep.net/search?p=collaboration:%27DPHEP%27&ln=en> Collaboration (Silvia Amerio<https://inspirehep.net/author/profile/Amerio%2C%20Silvia?recid=1408514&ln=en> (INFN, Padua<https://inspirehep.net/search?cc=Institutions&p=institution:%22INFN%2C%20Padua%22&ln=en>) et al.<https://inspirehep.net/record/1408514>). Feb 17, 2015. 60 pp. DPHEP-2015-001 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.46158<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.46158> e-Print: arXiv:1512.02019<http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1512.02019> [hep-ex] | PDF<http://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.02019.pdf> Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties<https://inspirehep.net/record/1241571> LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group<https://inspirehep.net/search?p=collaboration:%27LHC%20Higgs%20Cross%20Section%20Working%20Group%27&ln=en> (S Heinemeyer<https://inspirehep.net/author/profile/Heinemeyer%2C%20S?recid=1241571&ln=en> (ed.) (Cantabria Inst. of Phys.<https://inspirehep.net/search?cc=Institutions&p=institution:%22Cantabria%20Inst.%20of%20Phys.%22&ln=en>) et al.<https://inspirehep.net/record/1241571>). Jul 4, 2013. 404 pp. CERN-2013-004, FERMILAB-CONF-13-667-T DOI: 10.5170/CERN-2013-004<http://dx.doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2013-004> e-Print: arXiv:1307.1347<http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1307.1347> [hep-ph] | PDF<http://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.1347.pdf> Simon van der Meer and his legacy to CERN and particle accelerators<https://inspirehep.net/record/1207977> Vinod Chohan<https://inspirehep.net/author/profile/Chohan%2C%20Vinod?recid=1207977&ln=en> (CERN<https://inspirehep.net/search?cc=Institutions&p=institution:%22CERN%22&ln=en>). Dec 2012. 26 pp. CERN-2012-008 DOI: 10.5170/CERN-2012-008<http://dx.doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2012-008> e-Print: arXiv:1212.4320<http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1212.4320> [physics.hist-ph] | PDF<http://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.4320.pdf> Particle Physics 2011: Highlights and annual report<https://inspirehep.net/record/1123958> Manfred Fleischer<https://inspirehep.net/author/profile/Fleischer%2C%20Manfred?recid=1123958&ln=en> (ed.), Matthias Kasemann<https://inspirehep.net/author/profile/Kasemann%2C%20Matthias?recid=1123958&ln=en> (ed.) (DESY<https://inspirehep.net/search?cc=Institutions&p=institution:%22DESY%22&ln=en>). Jun 2012. 134 pp. Since we have introduced Reports not so long ago and it was comparatively easy to tag TDRs whereas other reports are more difficult to tag. So the current ratio is not really representative. But we could of course go for a more restrictive definition of Reports if we hfind consensus for this. - Annette On 25 Jan 2017, at 18:17, Micha Moskovic <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: I am not sure that's the way to go, as in the schema possible document types have been standardized here<https://github.com/inspirehep/inspire-schemas/blob/master/inspire_schemas/records/hep.json#L323> and here<https://github.com/inspirehep/inspire-schemas/blob/master/inspire_schemas/records/hep.json#L683>. I think we should rather decide whether 980__a:report == @TechReport, and adapt the bibtex format accordingly. I don't have strong opinions on this, nor did anyone on standup apparently. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#266 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AM1-O5xj9Xc3LJUfBWMqBfkRc_3ipTXQks5rV4OlgaJpZM4LtvEL>.