Update the options vignette

[vedhav]

Closes #1066

Changes:

1. Verified the current options we support.
   • ✅ teal (teal.load_nest_code, teal.show_js_log, teal.bs_theme)
   • ✅ teal.logger (teal.log_level)
   • ✅ teal.widgets (teal.basic_table_args, teal.ggplot2_args, teal.plot_dpi)
   • ✅ teal.slice (teal.threshold_slider_vs_checkboxgroup)
   • ❌ teal.modules.general (ggplot2.discrete.colour)
   • ❌ teal.modules.clinical (ggplot2.discrete.colour, tmc_default_total_label)
2. Removed the context of where the options were implemented, it seems unnecessary.
3. Reordered the options in the way that important and most used are at the top and are grouped when possible. And, moved the depreciated options to the bottom.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                          Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/dummy_functions.R                  30      21  30.00%   21-33, 36-43
R/get_rcode_utils.R                  32       1  96.88%   51
R/include_css_js.R                   22       0  100.00%
R/init.R                             86      31  63.95%   107-114, 160-161, 163, 175-196, 226-227, 229
R/landing_popup_module.R             25      25  0.00%    61-87
R/module_filter_manager.R           107      36  66.36%   79-85, 92-100, 109-114, 237, 242-255
R/module_nested_tabs.R              154      58  62.34%   102-175, 191, 243, 265, 291
R/module_snapshot_manager.R         209     157  24.88%   87-99, 127-136, 140-152, 154-161, 168-182, 186-188, 190-195, 198-208, 211-227, 236-251, 265-288, 291-302, 305-311, 325, 343-366
R/module_tabs_with_filters.R         76      33  56.58%   92-127, 159, 175
R/module_teal_with_splash.R         114       4  96.49%   110, 131, 197-198
R/module_teal.R                     139      32  76.98%   81, 92, 101, 174-175, 181, 212, 220-221, 243-274
R/modules.R                         153      27  82.35%   120-123, 140-144, 199-203, 285-286, 338, 350-358, 438-441
R/reporter_previewer_module.R        18       2  88.89%   30, 34
R/show_rcode_modal.R                 19      19  0.00%    17-36
R/tdata.R                            53       1  98.11%   154
R/teal_data_module-eval_code.R       27       0  100.00%
R/teal_data_module-within.R           7       0  100.00%
R/teal_data_module.R                  6       0  100.00%
R/teal_reporter.R                    60       5  91.67%   65, 114-115, 118, 135
R/teal_slices-store.R                29       0  100.00%
R/teal_slices.R                      59      12  79.66%   137-150
R/utils.R                           147      27  81.63%   117-144
R/validate_inputs.R                  32       0  100.00%
R/validations.R                      58      37  36.21%   110-377
R/zzz.R                              11       7  36.36%   3-14
TOTAL                              1673     535  68.02%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 850122a

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files   19 suites   10s ⏱️
207 tests 207 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
418 runs  418 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 850122a.

[m7pr]

👍 looks good.
I would only think that teal.log_level is the most popular option... but probably for a teal core dev team member and not the app developer :)

[vedhav]

I would only think that teal.log_level is the most popular option... but probably for a teal core dev team member and not the app developer :)

Yeah, I had to prioritize app developer > module developer > framework developer.