add support for optional .alt_df_full parameter for a/cfuns

[gmbecker]

closes #999. contains documentation updates and tests fyi @iaugusty

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

    1 files     28 suites   1m 42s ⏱️
  228 tests   228 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
1 606 runs  1 606 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 8ee7213.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Additional test case details

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	Test Case
Content functions (cfun)	👶		$+0.34$	full_alt_counts_df_is_accessible_from_afun_cfun_via_.alt_df_full

Results for commit a05df08

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                     Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
-------------------------  -------  ------  -------  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/00tabletrees.R               781      63  91.93%   20, 94, 97, 428, 519-520, 523, 681, 785, 877-878, 980, 983, 985-986, 1004-1007, 1027, 1142-1145, 1243-1248, 1404, 1504-1507, 1573-1576, 1612-1615, 1621-1626, 1677, 1684, 1778, 1886, 1899, 1902-1905, 1908-1911, 1938, 1970-1971
R/as_html.R                    167      25  85.03%   5-10, 77, 149-154, 159-164, 179-183, 270
R/colby_constructors.R         597      26  95.64%   81, 134, 197-200, 267-270, 411, 427, 1189, 1277, 1438, 1477, 1488, 1496, 1499, 1524, 1545, 1691, 1914-1917
R/compare_rtables.R             83      17  79.52%   93-96, 99-102, 115-118, 137, 156-157, 188, 193
R/custom_split_funs.R          265      40  84.91%   127, 132, 138-143, 156, 173-177, 353-358, 375-380, 456, 502, 518-521, 537, 599, 609-610, 612, 624, 668, 693
R/default_split_funs.R         286      22  92.31%   271, 334-337, 348-349, 351, 353, 550-554, 618-621, 684-687
R/format_rcell.R                13       0  100.00%
R/indent.R                      13       2  84.62%   40-41
R/index_footnotes.R             66       0  100.00%
R/make_split_fun.R             138      31  77.54%   22-26, 36-39, 52-55, 58-61, 115, 119, 267, 270-273, 278-281, 295, 366, 375, 377, 379, 430
R/make_subset_expr.R           137      15  89.05%   35, 47-61, 135-142, 178, 267, 271, 280
R/summary.R                    144      38  73.61%   35, 80, 178-220, 269, 315-331, 366, 397
R/tree_accessors.R            1129     142  87.42%   110, 139-140, 264, 284, 310, 333, 363, 381, 400-404, 426, 448-451, 566, 593-594, 880-886, 1030, 1049, 1075, 1127, 1184-1185, 1222, 1257, 1295-1300, 1359, 1433-1437, 1455-1464, 1542, 1662-1665, 1690, 1712-1713, 1723, 1774, 1795-1800, 1821-1826, 1837, 1911, 1952, 2051, 2158, 2171, 2185, 2201, 2210, 2220-2224, 2274-2279, 2482, 2492-2495, 2505, 2530-2533, 2540, 2542-2545, 2667, 2701-2702, 2759, 3064, 3425, 3541, 3575-3600, 3691-3699, 3852, 3926-3932, 4107, 4151-4152, 4159, 4162-4165, 4169, 4219, 4280, 4305-4329, 4358
R/tt_afun_utils.R              417      33  92.09%   57, 178, 185, 194-208, 276, 284-285, 503, 511-514, 596-600, 620, 634-636
R/tt_as_df.R                   398      23  94.22%   93-96, 104, 142, 216-219, 361, 380, 450, 469-472, 481, 586, 592, 624, 642, 694
R/tt_compare_tables.R           70       4  94.29%   51, 174, 246, 250
R/tt_compatibility.R           570      70  87.72%   19, 142-143, 186, 191, 319-320, 324-327, 333, 337, 521, 575-578, 615-617, 655, 688, 708, 728-731, 741-744, 789, 806-810, 816-819, 893, 920-923, 932, 994, 1002, 1013-1016, 1127, 1134, 1162-1176, 1207-1208
R/tt_dotabulation.R           1174      95  91.91%   60, 255, 260, 262, 311, 336, 340-343, 376-379, 402, 435-438, 466-469, 567, 709-713, 763, 767, 795-798, 808, 828-832, 839-842, 1106, 1110, 1141, 1244-1247, 1459-1467, 1731-1740, 1822-1825, 1836, 1841, 1846-1847, 1849, 1860, 1865, 1888, 1974-1993
R/tt_export.R                   13       1  92.31%   45
R/tt_from_df.R                  15       0  100.00%
R/tt_paginate.R                513      37  92.79%   74, 122-131, 441, 576-579, 600-604, 749-752, 803-810, 887, 890, 908, 915, 918
R/tt_pos_and_access.R          593      41  93.09%   76, 80, 105, 166, 212-216, 258, 531, 533, 541, 547, 561, 571-574, 760, 763, 771-775, 780-783, 810, 863-864, 875, 1037-1038, 1106-1122, 1392, 1467
R/tt_showmethods.R             162      21  87.04%   56, 91-113, 223, 249, 258, 263, 266-270, 359-360
R/tt_sort.R                    101       5  95.05%   245-248, 256
R/tt_toString.R                436      24  94.50%   126, 350, 372, 385, 395, 401, 404, 410-420, 513, 614, 821-846
R/utils.R                       34       7  79.41%   56, 169-174
R/validate_table_struct.R       84      10  88.10%   80-84, 93-94, 140, 149-150
R/Viewer.R                      61       9  85.25%   46, 50, 60-64, 84, 118
TOTAL                         8460     801  90.53%

Diff against main

Filename               Stmts    Miss  Cover
-------------------  -------  ------  -------
R/tt_dotabulation.R      +13       0  +0.09%
TOTAL                    +13       0  +0.01%

Results for commit: 8ee7213

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[gmbecker]

@shajoezhu this is the same silly spellcheck error that always happens with Daniel's name, no real failures

[shajoezhu]

hi @gmbecker , is this PR ready for review? can you please raise a PR downstream in tern and scda.test please, see if we have breaking changes.

I will look into chevron and autoslider thank you

• trigger test chevron#832
• trigger autoslider.core#51

acutally, should be simpler to check https://github.com/insightsengineering/rtables/actions/runs/13827630290 now

[shajoezhu]

hi @gmbecker , i was wondering if you could add explicit test case for using alt_df_full as an argument. thank you

[shajoezhu]

lgtm! thanks @gmbecker

[Melkiades]

Also for me it is good to go!! Thanks