Add code owners

[atm-snag2]

What

• Add code owners

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a CODEOWNERS file to designate the @increments/shared-dev-group as the owner for bundler files (gemspec and Gemfile) and GitHub Action workflows, removing the need for explicit dependabot reviewers.

• Added code owners entries for bundler-related files and GitHub Actions workflows.

[gemini-code-assist]

Hello @atm-snag2, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello team, gemini-code-assist here to provide a summary of this pull request. The primary goal of this PR, as indicated by the title and description, is to introduce code ownership configuration to the repository. This involves adding a .github/CODEOWNERS file to specify which teams or individuals are responsible for reviewing code changes in certain parts of the codebase. The description also mentions removing reviewers from Dependabot, which is a related configuration change often made when adopting CODEOWNERS.

Highlights

• Add CODEOWNERS file: This pull request introduces the .github/CODEOWNERS file, which is the standard way to define code owners in a GitHub repository. This file dictates who is automatically requested for review when changes are made to specific files or directories.
• Define initial code ownership rules: The newly added CODEOWNERS file includes rules assigning ownership of .gemspec files, the Gemfile, and files within the .github/workflows directory to the @increments/shared-dev-group team. This ensures that changes to these critical dependency and CI configuration files require review from the designated team.
• Align with Dependabot configuration: While not directly visible in the patch provided, the description notes that this change is intended to work in conjunction with removing reviewers from Dependabot, suggesting a shift towards using CODEOWNERS for review assignments, including those triggered by Dependabot PRs.

Changelog

• .github/CODEOWNERS
  • Added the .github/CODEOWNERS file to the repository.
  • Configured @increments/shared-dev-group as the code owner for /*.gemspec files.
  • Configured @increments/shared-dev-group as the code owner for the /Gemfile.
  • Configured @increments/shared-dev-group as the code owner for files within the /.github/workflows directory.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

---

Code owners arrive,
Files now have guardians true,
Reviews flow smoothly.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a .github/CODEOWNERS file, which is a great addition for clarifying code ownership and streamlining the review process. The file is well-structured and uses common conventions effectively. The use of package-ecosystem comments is a nice touch for associating rules with specific parts of the project, especially beneficial if tools like Dependabot are integrated.

Summary of Findings

• CODEOWNERS File Implementation: The added .github/CODEOWNERS file is clear, correctly structured, and adheres to standard GitHub practices. The patterns used (/*.gemspec, /Gemfile, /.github/workflows) accurately target the intended files and directories.
• Use of package-ecosystem Comments: The comments like # package-ecosystem: bundler, directories: / are well-placed and help organize the rules. This is particularly useful for maintainability and for integration with tools like Dependabot that might use this information to assign reviewers for automated dependency updates.
• Gemspec Path Pattern (Low Severity): The pattern /*.gemspec is used to assign ownership for gemspec files located at the root of the repository. This correctly matches the existing ruboty-github.gemspec file. While /ruboty-github.gemspec would be more explicit if this is the only root gemspec file intended to be matched, the current glob pattern is standard, flexible for potential (though unlikely in this repo structure) future root gemspec files, and perfectly functional. This is a minor observation of low severity and was not added as a direct review comment due to the project's review settings.
• Owner Group Verification (Operational Note): All rules assign ownership to @increments/shared-dev-group. For the CODEOWNERS functionality to work as expected, it's crucial that this GitHub team:

1. Exists within the GitHub organization.
2. Is spelled exactly as written.
3. Has write permissions to this repository.
   This is an operational check for the repository maintainers rather than a code issue. This is a low-severity observation and was not added as a direct review comment due to the project's review settings.

Merge Readiness

The changes in this pull request are straightforward and correctly implement the CODEOWNERS feature. No issues of medium or higher severity were identified. The code is clear, follows best practices for CODEOWNERS files, and is ready for merging from a technical standpoint.

Please note that I am an AI assistant and cannot approve pull requests. This PR should be reviewed and approved by authorized human maintainers before merging.

[wataru86]

LGTM!