-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Closed
Labels
baseline-comparisonPerformance comparison against baseline strategiesPerformance comparison against baseline strategies
Description
🎯 Objective
Expand testing to achieve statistical significance with 30+ sample trades and comprehensive multi-symbol validation.
📊 Current Status
- Sample Size: 7 trades (INSUFFICIENT - need 30+ minimum)
- Data Range: Limited SPY data 2008-2024
- Symbol Coverage: SPY only (missing QQQ, IWM)
- 2025 Data: Not available
- Test Documentation: No formal recording structure
🔴 Critical Requirements
1. Sample Size Expansion (Priority 1)
- Achieve minimum 30 GAMMA_TRAP pattern samples
- Expand historical data collection 2015-2024
- Add 2025 data when available
- Consider relaxing pattern detection thresholds
2. Multi-Symbol Testing
- Add QQQ pattern detection and validation
- Add IWM pattern detection and validation
- Implement symbol-specific pattern calibration
- Cross-symbol pattern consistency analysis
3. Formal Test Recording Structure
reports/
├── testing/
│ ├── gamma_trap/
│ │ ├── README.md (methodology)
│ │ ├── spy_2015_2024/
│ │ ├── qqq_2015_2024/
│ │ └── iwm_2015_2024/
│ ├── by_period/
│ │ ├── 2015_2019/
│ │ ├── 2020_2024/
│ │ └── 2025/ (when available)
│ └── statistical_validation/
│ ├── sample_size_analysis/
│ └── significance_tests/
4. Implementation Tasks
- Create comprehensive backtesting pipeline
- Implement test result persistence
- Add reproducibility documentation
- Build comparison tools for different periods/symbols
📈 Success Metrics
- Minimum 30 trades per pattern type
- 95% statistical confidence achieved
- Pattern consistency across SPY/QQQ/IWM
- Complete test documentation and reproducibility
🚀 Priority
PRIORITY 1 - Statistical validity depends on adequate sample size
Related to Issues: #11 (Statistical Validation), #35 (Baseline Comparison), #39 (Forward Testing)
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
baseline-comparisonPerformance comparison against baseline strategiesPerformance comparison against baseline strategies