Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing methods to transaction interface #5732
Add missing methods to transaction interface #5732
Changes from 21 commits
e3752c8
d4cdcc3
e1e93dc
547133b
3ebafb3
8221324
ff7c669
d7c6ef3
349649e
bf99643
4f0fe20
675bd30
4e08e53
312769b
8bf7073
5f6666d
6855b76
5ca6a64
180135a
876c4e4
3d7c991
b71032f
12b88e1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One of my goals is to remove the RLP dependency from the datatypes module.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've replaced it with a new generic method
Bytes encoded();
: see hereThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After diving into what it would take to remove it I'm thinking it should come back.
Because the CREATE operation depends on the RLP definitions to get the contract addresses the EVM module will still require the RLP, it's not just coming into EVM as a tag-along of datatypes. So removing RLP from datatypes is not really needed, as some of the RLP dependencies once it is determined they should stay are best handled where they are at design-wise.
For performance we will want to use a passed in RLPOutput object as well.