Update basefee implementation to use Uint256 rather than long #2785
Closed
Description
Besu's implementation of EIP1559 is using a long instead of Uint256 for baseFee. This is not likely to be a problem in the near future since baseFee would have to be in excess of 9 eth to cause an overflow, but we should match the types in the spec.
Acceptance criteria:
- update implementation and tests to use Uint256 baseFee
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels