Skip to content

Update basefee implementation to use Uint256 rather than long #2785

Closed
@garyschulte

Description

Besu's implementation of EIP1559 is using a long instead of Uint256 for baseFee. This is not likely to be a problem in the near future since baseFee would have to be in excess of 9 eth to cause an overflow, but we should match the types in the spec.

Acceptance criteria:

  • update implementation and tests to use Uint256 baseFee

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions