π¬π§ English | π°π· νκ΅μ΄
Practical comparison of 5 hyperparameter optimization algorithms for machine learning
π°π· νκ΅μ΄ | π¬π§ English | π― Quick Start | π Results
Typical Performance Pattern (Diabetes Dataset: 442 samples, 10 features, 50 iterations)
| Method | Typical Improvement | Speed | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPE (Hyperopt) | ~27% ββ | Fastest β‘ | Best overall performance |
| Random Search | ~26% β | Fast | Quick prototyping, reliable |
| Optuna (TPE+Pruning) | ~26% β | Fast | Production systems |
| Bayesian Optimization | ~26% β | Moderate | Critical performance needs |
| Grid Search | ~22% | Slow | Small search spaces |
| Baseline (default) | 0% | - | Reference point |
π‘ Important Note: Actual results vary based on random_state, data split, and environment. All methods typically improve baseline by 20-27%. Run the notebook to see results on your machine.
β‘ Key Insight: TPE (Hyperopt) achieved the highest improvement (+27.12%), closely followed by Random Search (+26.33%) and Optuna (+26.02%). Modern Bayesian methods consistently outperform Grid Search with better efficiency.
- Grid Search - Exhaustive search through all parameter combinations
- Random Search - Random sampling from parameter distributions
- Optuna - Modern TPE with pruning (replaces deprecated HyperBand)
- Bayesian Optimization - Probabilistic model-based optimization
- TPE (Hyperopt) - Tree-structured Parzen Estimator
- Understand strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm
- Know which method to choose for different scenarios
- Implement optimization in real projects with working code
- Compare results with statistical rigor
- Reduce hyperparameter tuning time significantly
git clone https://github.com/hyeonsangjeon/Hyperparameters-Optimization.git
cd Hyperparameters-Optimization
pip install -r requirements.txtInteractive Notebook (Recommended)
jupyter notebook HyperParameterInspect.ipynb # Korean
jupyter notebook HyperParameterInspect_EN.ipynb # EnglishAutomated Benchmark
python benchmark_hpo_algorithms.py| Your Scenario | Recommended | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quick prototyping | Random Search | Fast setup, decent results |
| Production deployment | Optuna | Modern, pruning, actively maintained |
| Best performance needed | Bayesian Optimization | Superior results, worth extra time |
| Limited time budget | TPE (Hyperopt) | Best speed/quality tradeoff |
| Small discrete space | Grid Search | Guarantees finding optimum |
| Research paper | Bayesian + TPE | Multiple strong baselines |
| Algorithm | How It Works | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid Search | Exhaustive evaluation of all combinations | Complete coverage, reproducible | Exponential complexity |
| Random Search | Random sampling from distributions | Fast, handles continuous params | No learning between trials |
| Optuna | TPE with automatic pruning | Modern, efficient, production-ready | Requires setup |
| Bayesian Optimization | Gaussian process model of objective | Intelligent search, best results | Slower initial phase |
| TPE | Tree-structured Parzen estimators | Fast convergence, proven reliability | Fewer features than Optuna |
- Dataset: Sklearn Diabetes (442 samples, 10 features)
- Model: LightGBM Regressor
- Iterations: 50 trials per method
- Validation: 2-fold cross-validation
- Metric: Mean Squared Error (lower is better)
| Algorithm | Speed | Consistency | Typical Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPE (Hyperopt) | β‘β‘β‘ Fastest | High | 25-35% |
| Optuna | β‘β‘β‘ Very Fast | High | 20-30% |
| Random Search | β‘β‘ Fast | Medium | 20-30% |
| Bayesian Opt | β‘ Moderate | High | 20-30% |
| Grid Search | β Slow | Very High | 15-25% |
β οΈ Note: Values shown are from recent benchmark run. Absolute MSE values vary by environment and random_state, but the ranking and relative performance are consistent across runs.
Hyperparameters-Optimization/
βββ HyperParameterInspect.ipynb # Korean tutorial notebook
βββ HyperParameterInspect_EN.ipynb # English tutorial notebook
βββ benchmark_hpo_algorithms.py # Automated benchmark script
βββ requirements.txt # Python dependencies
βββ README.md # This file
βββ pic/ # Images and plots
βββ doc/ # Additional documentation
Core Dependencies
- Python 3.8+
- numpy, pandas, scikit-learn, lightgbm
Optimization Libraries
- optuna >= 3.0.0 (Modern HPO with pruning)
- hyperopt >= 0.2.7 (TPE algorithm)
- scikit-optimize >= 0.9.0 (Bayesian optimization)
Visualization
- matplotlib, jupyter
β οΈ Important: This project uses Optuna instead of the deprecatedscikit-hyperbandlibrary due to compatibility issues with modern scikit-learn versions.
- Random Search: Bergstra & Bengio, JMLR 2012
- TPE: Bergstra et al., NIPS 2011
- Bayesian Optimization: Snoek et al., 2012
- HyperBand: Li et al., ICLR 2018
-
π€ Hyeonsang Jeon, "Expert Lecture: Hyperparameter Optimization in AI Modeling", ITDAILY, 2022. Article
-
π€ Hyeonsang Jeon, "Case Study: AutoDL with Hyperparameter Optimization in Deep Learning Platforms", AI Innovation 2020, The Electronic Times, 2020. Video
-
π° Featured in ComWorld
Contributions welcome! Ways to help:
- π Report bugs or issues
- π‘ Suggest new features or algorithms
- π Improve documentation
- π Translate to other languages
- π¬ Add optimization methods
Development Setup
git clone https://github.com/YOUR_USERNAME/Hyperparameters-Optimization.git
cd Hyperparameters-Optimization
python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
python benchmark_hpo_algorithms.pyMIT License - see LICENSE file for details.
Hyeonsang Jeon
GitHub: @hyeonsangjeon
Special thanks to:
- Optuna - Modern HPO framework
- Hyperopt - TPE implementation
- scikit-optimize - Bayesian optimization
- LightGBM - Fast gradient boosting
- Optuna - Next-generation HPO framework
- Hyperopt - Distributed HPO library
- scikit-optimize - Bayesian optimization
- Ray Tune - Scalable distributed tuning
Star this repository to support the project and help others discover it!
This tutorial is actively maintained and regularly updated with new techniques.
Made with β€οΈ for the ML community

