-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Save Processor
#27761
Merged
Merged
Save Processor
#27761
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Update tests/test_processing_common.py
Co-authored-by: Arthur <48595927+ArthurZucker@users.noreply.github.com>
- Loading branch information
commit ff2274e73292760b14a792468f76d8afb148b313
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to add tests to make sure we only call the hub once, make sure kwargs passed to the processor class are correctly forwarded to the init of the tokenizer and the feature extractor (specifically trust_remote_code, and additional kwargs that do not exist are not duplicated)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have such test for processors, but yes we need to test this with the a processor class whose
init
has extra kwargs and with a "processor_config.json" on the Hub. However, we don't have such process yet ...So far, the processor classes don't have
kwargs
, not even in this PR. The initialization of the tokenizer and the feature extractor is not through the initialization of processor class: they are created , then are send to processor class' init.Note: the extra kwargs we would like to have in a processor class, IMO, are not designed to control the tokenizer/feature extractor at their creation time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well, I found we only have this tests for torch/tf model, tokenizer and pipeline (in auto). Not sure why we don't have this for image/feature extractor/processor.