Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for GPTQ-quantized MoE models using MoE Marlin #2557

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

danieldk
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

This change add support for MoE models that use GPTQ quantization.
Currently only models with the following properties are supported:

  • No desc_act with tensor parallelism, unless group_size=-1.
  • No asymmetric quantization.
  • No AWQ.

Draft: needs to be rebased on #2537 once that PR is merged.

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline,
    Pull Request section?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
    to it if that's the case.
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
    documentation guidelines, and
    here are tips on formatting docstrings.
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

Who can review?

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.

@danieldk danieldk marked this pull request as draft September 24, 2024 11:28
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
inputs.nixpkgs.follows = "tgi-nix/nixpkgs";
};
nix-filter.url = "github:numtide/nix-filter";
tgi-nix.url = "github:danieldk/tgi-nix";
tgi-nix.url = "github:danieldk/tgi-nix/moe-kernels-0.4.0";
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be moved back on master no ?

Copy link
Member Author

@danieldk danieldk Sep 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah. On a branch to avoid accidentally updating the tgi-nix input, which would break MoE on TGI master (since 0.4.0 is an API break).

@danieldk danieldk marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2024 14:55
@danieldk danieldk force-pushed the feature/moe-marlin branch 2 times, most recently from 6d543b2 to 83953fa Compare September 30, 2024 07:31
This change add support for MoE models that use GPTQ quantization.
Currently only models with the following properties are supported:

- No `desc_act` with tensor parallelism, unless `group_size=-1`.
- No asymmetric quantization.
- No AWQ.
@danieldk danieldk merged commit 90a1d04 into main Sep 30, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@danieldk danieldk deleted the feature/moe-marlin branch September 30, 2024 09:14
yuanwu2017 pushed a commit to yuanwu2017/tgi-gaudi that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2024
…ce#2557)

This change add support for MoE models that use GPTQ quantization.
Currently only models with the following properties are supported:

- No `desc_act` with tensor parallelism, unless `group_size=-1`.
- No asymmetric quantization.
- No AWQ.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants