-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
[CI] Nightly Test Updates #9380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor comments.
expected_slice = np.array([0.1199, 0.1171, 0.1229, 0.1188, 0.1210, 0.1147, 0.1260, 0.1346, 0.1152]) | ||
assert np.abs(image_slice - expected_slice).max() < 0.003 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably because of the runner change?
image_slice = image[0, -3:, -3:, -1].flatten() | ||
|
||
assert image.shape == (1, 512, 512, 3) | ||
expected_slice = np.array([0.9983, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.9989, 0.9994, 0.9976, 0.9977]) | ||
assert np.abs(image_slice - expected_slice).max() < 3e-3 | ||
expected_slice = np.array([0.1509, 0.1492, 0.1531, 0.1485, 0.1501, 0.1465, 0.1581, 0.1690, 0.1499]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same (runner change effects)?
@@ -607,175 +607,14 @@ def tearDown(self): | |||
gc.collect() | |||
torch.cuda.empty_cache() | |||
|
|||
def test_stable_diffusion_adapter_color(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think testing for different variants isn't too bad in general. Instead of deleting them how about we keep all of them but one (perhaps the most downloaded one; depth) commented? We could also do the same for ControlNet tests.
WDYT?
I think the failing tests are unrelated. |
* update * update * update * update * update --------- Co-authored-by: Sayak Paul <spsayakpaul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: YiYi Xu <yixu310@gmail.com>
What does this PR do?
This PR:
runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5
withJiali/stable-diffusion-1.5
. Until we find a permanent host for the SD1.5 checkpoint. Switching to a finetune would require updating all the slices. So this is a temporary solution.runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5-inpainting
withbotp/stable-diffusion-v1-5-inpainting
runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5
Fixes # (issue)
Before submitting
documentation guidelines, and
here are tips on formatting docstrings.
Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.