Skip to content

Why does SMF tinker with DKIM? #111

Closed
@StrangePeanut

Description

DKIM was developed with email forwarding in mind. DKIM validity of forwarded email should not break. Why does SMF decide to tinker with DKIM when it should be left alone?

Since the README.md does not include any use cases examples, I apologise if I am missing a legitimate use case. It would be great if an explanation could be added to README.md in this case.

Been looking for a simple email forwarding solution and I am so glad to have found SMF. Many thanks for this brilliant solution to email forwarding.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions