Apply Willy's suggestion to large number examples #3234
Conversation
| Upload-Complete: ?1 | ||
| Upload-Offset: 25000000 | ||
| Content-Length: 25000000 | ||
| Upload-Offset: 46913578 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we make sure that the final completed length is 1234567890? So each chunk can be 1200000000, 34000000, 560000, 7800, 90?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My understanding of the examples was that they are fairly isolated from each other. Even prior to the change to use larger numbers, in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-09.html#section-4.4.3 the appends result in an object that has a total length of 300 bytes, which doesn't correlate to any upload length in other examples.
Furthermore, I'd prefer to keep examples concise. Adding multiple append operations that don't do much beyond using a different size increases the length of example and might add more source of confusion. I created #3250 that highlights this via reuse of the same URL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh I wasn't suggesting adding more appends to the example, I was just thinking 46913578 kind of loses the benefit of the easily recognizable number. If offset is 1230000000 and length is 4567890, it's obvious that they add up together as 1234567890
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah I undestand now, I can do that
3 participants
Taking the suggestion from #3231
Closes #3231