Skip to content

Conversation

jbr
Copy link
Member

@jbr jbr commented Jun 27, 2020

This reverts #3 and uses async-channel instead
closes #4
closes #5

I realized after pushing this that it probably would have been easier to read as two distinct commits. This is probably the clearest view of the changes: 886cd75...95ddc4b

@jbr jbr requested a review from yoshuawuyts June 27, 2020 20:58
@jbr jbr force-pushed the use-async-channel branch from 1a5e3ce to eb49894 Compare June 27, 2020 21:03
@jbr jbr force-pushed the use-async-channel branch from eb49894 to 3235743 Compare June 27, 2020 21:05
Copy link
Member

@yoshuawuyts yoshuawuyts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking great!

@yoshuawuyts yoshuawuyts merged commit 73906b7 into http-rs:master Jun 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use async-channel Reevaluate the Arc<Mutex> used to track disconnection
2 participants