Tex: de-duplicate ultisnips snippets already defined in snipmate format #1505
Conversation
|
Question: is there value in making sure the ultisnip and snippets commands are the same. Or, on the contrary, is there a reason to make sure they're not the same? |
|
The ultisnips ones should be removed- they should only exist for specific snippets that cannot be implemented using the snipmate format. |
|
Aha, right. I hadn't realised that. I'll update the PR now. Could this please be documented in the Readme under a "contributing" section perhaps, just so future contributors know? |
|
It is already documented, but improvements to the README are welcome. |
Remove from ultisnips those that are already defined in snipmate format
since UltiSnips supports both
sanjayankur31
force-pushed
the
feat/latex
branch
from
970948f to
2220b4b
Compare
|
Updated to remove UltiSnip snippets that are already defined in the snipmate format. I couldn't find where in the docs it says to prefer snipmat since UltiSnips can also read them, so I've added a line in the Readme. |
|
|
||
| snippet chapl "Chapter with label" wi | ||
| \chapter{$1${VISUAL}} | ||
| \label{cha:${2:${1/\W+/-/g}}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these are already defined in snipmate, so I removed them, but the labels here are more advanced, so we could leave these in as UltiSnips specific overrides.
sanjayankur31
changed the title
No description provided.