-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New README.md #50
New README.md #50
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request significantly updates the README.md file for the ufpy project. The changes include adding a project logo, badges, and comprehensive sections on key features, installation instructions, contribution guidelines, and support information. The new README provides a more professional and informative introduction to the project, enhancing its visibility and usability for potential users and contributors. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The Pylint badge in the README has an empty URL. Please add the correct URL to ensure the badge displays properly.
- Consider providing a more descriptive pull request message that explains the purpose of these changes and how they relate to issue Do beatiful README.md with information about project #49.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟡 Documentation: 1 issue found
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
@sourcery-ai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟡 Documentation: 1 issue found
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟡 Documentation: 1 issue found
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
@sourcery-ai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider adding a brief code example to demonstrate one of the key features, such as UDict or GitHub download functionality.
- Please verify if the Python version badge (3.12+) accurately reflects the minimum supported Python version for the package.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟡 Documentation: 1 issue found
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
@sourcery-ai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider using standard markdown syntax instead of HTML for better compatibility across different platforms and renderers.
- It might be beneficial to include a brief code example in the README to showcase the package's key functionality.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟡 Documentation: 1 issue found
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
Ready for merge! |
closes #49
Summary by Sourcery
Update the README.md to enhance its content and structure, including a project logo, feature highlights, installation instructions, contribution guidelines, and support information.
Documentation: