Draft
Conversation
Member
|
For custom integration, we can still prefix them right? But not sure how to detect that |
Member
Author
Member
Author
|
Maybe just remove the prefix from entity type integrations for now...? |
Member
|
Yeah it can be a solution ! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.


Proposed change
Since work has been done to change the name of actions to align with the name of triggers and conditions, it is not longer needed to prefix the name of actions with the domain name.
TODO: check if everything is migrated, what to do with (custom) integrations providing actions that might now miss the prefix.
Screenshots
Type of change
Additional information
Checklist
If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:
To help with the load of incoming pull requests: