Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for Mi AirPurifier 3 #31729
Add support for Mi AirPurifier 3 #31729
Changes from 2 commits
9cd4464
65c2f15
7a6fd59
7d6857e
d220841
d700d22
1ec5cac
9ee5178
e230c72
93d5aa4
3639b1a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why change this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Duplicates ATTR_MOTOR_SPEED on line 139. Didn't drop this entirely just to keep the notion of this attribute in this "Air Humidifier CA" section
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Relative times are not allowed in the state machine. We only allow absolute utc timestamps.
Times should preferably be represented as sensors with device class timestamp.
https://developers.home-assistant.io/docs/entity_sensor#available-device-classes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, should this be completely removed then? The problem with this value is, I presume, that there is no specific timestamp as it depends on the usage. ping @foxel - do you have an idea on this?
P.S. I think we need to have a checklist for reviewers, much like what we have for PR creators, to list things to check. It is sometimes hard to spot all mistakes, and I'm very sorry for not catching this one..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should update this dev docs page with the allowed fan speeds:
https://developers.home-assistant.io/docs/entity_fan
I'll put it on my todo.
In general we need to make sure that we follow our architecture docs and ADRs. But those are not complete yet, so that's a problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's interesting that relative timestamps are not allowed in state attributes. Didn't know that. Where can I find more docs about it?
I have MQTT devices, Esphome which are breaking this rule. This cannot be found in HA code as HA just puts received json in
state_attrs
.my vacuum state attributes:
@rytilahti solution for it is to move attributes to independent sensors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only allowed speed modes for fans are off, low, medium and high.
core/homeassistant/components/fan/__init__.py
Lines 35 to 38 in dc7127a
We should not continue to extend this platform with architecture design breaking changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I didn't notice that... How can we make the situation better? Should the tests be improved to capture such misuses?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure how we can test this generally. Some platforms are already breaking the rules which might also complicate any general tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MartinHjelmare what if a device does not fall into such a specification?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The platform can try to translate between home assistant mode and device mode. The platform can also register custom services.
The current design does not cater well to all fans but until we have a better design we have to follow it. We have an open architecture issue on fan speeds. You're welcome to contribute to that and try to bring it forward. We need to figure out a design that can cater for a majority of fans but is still compatible with our frontend and voice assistants.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was rechecking this PR and saw these and wondered why the one below is not merged here, before I realized that one is
_3
and one_V3
. Do you think it would make sense to addMIOT
somewhere in there to make it easier to differentiate?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't ever see V3 version but it's something older and different from 3/3h from 2019...
I don't think adding MIOT would be the best solution. I think in not so distant future we'll need to have 2/2s/Pro support with MiOT protocol...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or simply use some part of the real model number? It's mildly confusing to differentiate between those constants. Anyway, this is not a blocking issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One last thing to do before merging, please update the documentation (for the model listing & the new service): https://github.com/home-assistant/home-assistant.io/blob/current/source/_integrations/fan.xiaomi_miio.markdown
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Made one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, let's get this merged, the docs will follow as soon as someone reviews it! Thanks for your hard work and patience on this! 🥇
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make more sense to save a reference to the mode as given by the library and simply use
_speed.name
? Usage ofisinstance
is generally speaking not a good thing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've changed this to get rid of runtime instance checking
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to find a better solution for this, too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not allowed. The package must be published to pypi.
Sorry didn't see it was a draft.