Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not unsubscribe mqtt integration discovery if entry is already configured #126907

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

jbouwh
Copy link
Contributor

@jbouwh jbouwh commented Sep 27, 2024

Proposed change

Integrations that support mqtt discovery use an integration discovery topic for discovery of a device. When am entry is discovered once it should not be set up again if the discovery message is send again. In that case the config flow is aborted. The MQTT integration used to unsubscribe to the integration discovery topic after such a flow was aborted with already_configured or single_instance_allowed. When multyple entries are supported by an integration this will cause an issue as when the integration discovery topic is unsubscribed to, no new discovery is possible.

This PR will fix this issue by no longer unsubscribe the integration discovery topic when an already_configured abort flow happened. In case of a single_instance_abort flow the integration discovery topic will still be unsubscribed to.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @emontnemery, @bdraco, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (mqtt) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of mqtt can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign mqtt Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

@emontnemery emontnemery added this to the 2024.10.0 milestone Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@emontnemery emontnemery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code change looks good, just a question about tests

@@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ class TestFlow(config_entries.ConfigFlow):

async def async_step_mqtt(self, discovery_info: MqttServiceInfo) -> FlowResult:
"""Test mqtt step."""
return self.async_abort(reason="already_configured")
return self.async_abort(reason="single_instance_allowed")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have other tests which checks we don't abort if the abort reason is different?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not yet, we only had a test for already_configured which I adjusted.
I'll add a test for the already_configured to prove the subscription remains.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parameterized the tests now, and added some cases where we do not unsubscribe

Copy link
Contributor

@emontnemery emontnemery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @jbouwh 👍

@jbouwh jbouwh merged commit 7fde2e2 into dev Sep 27, 2024
44 checks passed
@jbouwh jbouwh deleted the mqtt-fix-integration-discovery-multi-entry branch September 27, 2024 15:28
frenck pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
…figured (#126907)

* Do not unsubscribe mqtt integration discovery if entry is already configured

* Test cases without unsubscribe
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants