Skip to content

Conversation

@arjenz
Copy link

@arjenz arjenz commented Nov 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Fixed grammar in the Let's Encrypt README documentation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Copy link

@home-assistant home-assistant bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @arjenz

It seems you haven't yet signed a CLA. Please do so here.

Once you do that we will be able to review and accept this pull request.

Thanks!

@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft November 25, 2025 18:12
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single grammatical correction was made in the documentation, changing "others addons" to "other addons" in one sentence within the README file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation Grammar Fix
letsencrypt/README.md
Corrected grammar: "others addons" → "other addons"

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

  • Single-word grammar correction in documentation with no functional impact

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Update README.md' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that doesn't convey the specific change (grammar correction). Use a more descriptive title that specifies the change, such as 'Fix grammar in letsencrypt README' or 'Correct "other addons" in README'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9b856c and 5d80463.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • letsencrypt/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
*/**(html|markdown|md)

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

*/**(html|markdown|md): - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.

  • Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
  • In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
  • In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
  • In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
  • do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'

*/**(html|markdown|md): - Use bold to mark UI strings.

  • If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.

  • Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"

  • Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.

do not comment on HTML used for icons

Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.

Files:

  • letsencrypt/README.md
🔇 Additional comments (1)
letsencrypt/README.md (1)

10-10: LGTM!

The grammatical correction is accurate and improves the clarity of the documentation.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@frenck
Copy link
Member

frenck commented Nov 25, 2025

Oh hi there @arjenz 👋

Don't forget to sign the CLA and mark the PR ready for review after that.

Without signing the CLA, we can (unfortunately), not accept or move forward with this contribution.

Thanks already!

../Frenck

                       

Blogging my personal ramblings at frenck.dev

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants