-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
Relationships in Manage Items/Services #11705
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update the relationships management interface by replacing the table-based layout with modern UI components. The layout now relies on Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant UI as Relationships UI
participant S as Server
U->>UI: Select a relationship from the list
U->>UI: Click "Add" or "Delete" button
UI->>S: Process action (using @this)
S-->>UI: Return updated state
U->>UI: Update details in the panel
U->>UI: Click "Save" button
UI->>S: Process save action (targeting details panel)
S-->>UI: Confirm update
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/main/webapp/admin/items/relationships.xhtml (1)
72-138
: Consider removing commented code.While keeping the old implementation as comments might be helpful during development and testing, it's generally better to remove commented-out code before merging to production. The version control system already preserves the history of changes, making these comments unnecessary and potentially confusing for future developers.
-<!-- <table class="w-100">--> -<!-- <tr>--> -... -<!-- </tr>--> -<!-- </table>-->
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/main/webapp/admin/items/relationships.xhtml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/main/webapp/admin/items/relationships.xhtml (5)
15-16
: Modern layout structure improves visual organization.The new layout using
p:panelGrid
with defined columns and styling creates a more balanced and responsive design compared to the previous table-based approach. The gap styling and width classes help maintain consistent spacing.Also applies to: 71-71
17-28
: Selection panel enhancements look good.The updated list box implementation maintains the same functionality while providing better styling. Using
style="width:100%"
ensures the component properly fills its container, improving responsiveness.
29-44
: Button layout improvements with proper icons.The flex container for buttons creates better spacing and alignment. Adding icons to the buttons enhances visual cues for users. The process attribute change from specific IDs to
@this
is an improvement that limits the scope of Ajax processing.
46-59
: Details panel structure is well organized.The panel grid implementation provides better alignment of labels and input fields. The styling ensures consistent width of input fields, improving the form layout.
60-69
: Save button styling and placement is improved.Centering the save button and adding an icon enhances usability. The process attribute now correctly targets only the details panel, which is more efficient than the previous implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/main/webapp/admin/items/relationships.xhtml (1)
46-59
: Consider adding input validation.While the panel structure and layout are well-designed, there's no visible validation for these input fields. Consider adding validation constraints to ensure data integrity.
<p:inputText id="atobName" value="#{relationshipController.current.atobName}" - style="width:100%" /> + style="width:100%" required="true" /> +<p:message for="atobName" /> <p:inputText id="btoaName" value="#{relationshipController.current.btoaName}" - style="width:100%" /> + style="width:100%" required="true" /> +<p:message for="btoaName" /> <p:inputText id="orderNo" value="#{relationshipController.current.orderNo}" - style="width:100%" /> + style="width:100%" validatorMessage="Order No must be a number"> + <f:validateLongRange /> +</p:inputText> +<p:message for="orderNo" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/main/webapp/admin/items/relationships.xhtml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/main/webapp/admin/items/relationships.xhtml (3)
15-16
: UI layout improvement with modern components.The redesign with
p:panel
andp:panelGrid
creates a more structured and responsive layout compared to traditional tables. The gap styling provides good visual separation between panels.
17-28
: Well-structured selection component with proper AJAX handling.The
p:selectOneListbox
with full-width styling provides an improved interface for relationship selection. The AJAX event is efficiently configured to only execute and render the necessary components.
29-44
: Enhanced button styling and optimized processing.The command buttons now include appropriate icons and are arranged in a flex container with proper spacing. The
process="@this"
attribute optimizes performance by only processing the clicked button during action execution.
Improve the UI in Relationships in Manage Items/Services
#1729
Summary by CodeRabbit