Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update clarinet project template #1367

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

hugocaillard
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Update the package.json and vitest.config

  • clarinet-sdk and vitest-environment-clarinet versions to be released
  • the vitest pool: "forks" option seems to be more stable (and I didn't notice significant decrease of performances). The previous version doesn't apparently lead to issues very often, but could do. According to the documentation,, it could be do to the fact the clarinet_sdk_bg.wasm file is fetched with node fetch

Checklist

  • Tests added in this PR (if applicable)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.17%. Comparing base (a6d4504) to head (283446c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1367   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    41.17%   41.17%           
========================================
  Files           86       86           
  Lines        31643    31643           
========================================
  Hits         13030    13030           
  Misses       18613    18613           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hugocaillard hugocaillard merged commit 80be703 into develop Mar 1, 2024
19 checks passed
@hugocaillard hugocaillard deleted the chore/update-clarinet-project-templates branch March 1, 2024 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants