*** AWESOME CLAUDE CODE FEATURE BOUNTY *** #287
Replies: 6 comments 10 replies
-
|
OK we got somewhere between 10 and 17 people that want that bounty!!! I should have just gone with "thumbs-up" because now I don't know if I'm double-counting between up-votes and thumbs-up... but we're still not at that critical mass! Spread the word, tell you buddies, you can even find a solution that already exists and just try to iterate on it, I don't want that bounty to go to waste! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The bounty is slipping away...... 💰 I must conclude that people are generally satisfied with the Claude Code TUI session resumption/continuation UX. 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
thanks folks! i think this issue didn't generate enough heat to organize any type of formal event, but let me know if you have any ideas for possible future bounties, or if you think there's something I could have done to promote it better. Cheers! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I added a Screencast.From.2025-11-14.21-44-30.webm |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is this relevant here? - https://github.com/banton/claude-dementia |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My sense of the underlying need is that the user wants Claude to maintain
full knowledge of the entire context that was aware of in the previous
session. So either I resume a previous session or I start a new session
with a snapshot view of the context that it had at the end of a previous
session, the outcome should still be the same, no? Not sure if I am missing
an important piece of the puzzle here.
…On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 9:18 PM Really Him ***@***.***> wrote:
@deepakdgupta1 <https://github.com/deepakdgupta1> gotcha - thanks it
looks like a nice library - I think the issue about "session naming" is
really core to the Issue the bounty was intended to solve for though, don't
you think?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#287 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5ATFWP55HB3JL33I3QWDP336XDTLAVCNFSM6AAAAACKXBPOQWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTKMBYHAYTANI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
<hesreallyhim/awesome-claude-code/repo-discussions/287/comments/15088105@
github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏆
Awesome Claude Code Feature BountyTHE BOUNTY GOT AWAY... IF YOU HAVE AN IDEA FOR ANOTHER ONE, LET'S MAKE IT HAPPEN
The Problem
Every couple of days, someone opens a GitHub issue requesting better session tracking, continuation, and resumption in Claude Code. Here's one recent example:
This is a real pain point. The interface has improved a lot, but people keep asking for a better solution.
So... what are we waiting for? Let's build it ourselves.
The Bounty
I'm offering a $100 CASH PRIZE (distributed among all contributors) and permanent recognition to anyone who helps develop a solution that is adopted by consensus by this community.
How It Works
This is NOT a traditional competition. Here's the concept:
This is about collaborative problem-solving, working together in friendly competition, and having a little fun.
The Question
Before I commit to organizing this, I need to know:
Are you interested in participating in a community-driven effort to solve this together?
This means contributing code, testing solutions, voting in elimination rounds, and actually using what we build.
Drop a comment or react if you're in. [EDIT: USE THUMBS-UP REACTION TO INDICATE INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION] If enough people show interest, we'll kick this off properly with clear requirements and a timeline. I want to see at least 25 positive reactions before I decide to kick this off.
Let's see what this community can do!
A Note on Direct Action
This bounty is an experiment in direct action - the idea that people don't have to wait for institutions to solve their problems. If we have the skills and the will, we can build the solution ourselves.
This isn't about competing with Anthropic, or trying to "prove a point" - it's about looking at what people are saying on GitHub - seeing that there's a need - and working together to build something that will make other users happy. If we can collaboratively solve a problem that's been bugging people for months, why not do it? That's the type of thing that I'm willing to spend my resources on: see a problem, call people together, build a solution.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions