Bump dependency on process #8279
Conversation
|
It turns out that process-1.6.14.0 depends on base-4.10 (so GHC 8.2). (That lower bound came with this PR and is probably not due to incompatibility, but just because CI doesn't test GHC versions earlier than 8.2.) |
|
I think we are going to need another RC, in which case there's going to be enough time to dogfood (and userfood) this change. |
| @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ | |||
| "source": "local", | |||
| "version": "3.9.0.0" | |||
| }, | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
wow some way to generate this auto would be handy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is auto-generated with make update-bootstrap-jsons or something like that. But, if we are lukcy, a backport is going to be easier with the small change.
This is guarded to be for GHC from 8.2 only, since the process release depends on base-4.10. Includes an update to the bootstrapping files.
andreabedini
force-pushed
the
bump-process
branch
from
5099499
to
f9475d4
Compare
|
@Mergifyio backport 3.8 |
✅ Backports have been created
|
Bump dependency on process (backport #8279)
|
I've just tried cabal from https://gitlab.haskell.org/haskell/cabal/-/jobs/1108769 and I no longer see the spurious process messages. Was worth it. :) |
|
It seems we need to bump up the process package one notch again due to NorfairKing/feedback#2 I think it's not grave enough to derail 3.8.1.0, but let's backport for the benefit of the hypothetical 3.8.2.0. |
Let me do that in a new PR. |
Compare the discussion in #8208.