Fix typo explitic - #11621
Conversation
fed50c7 to
0e6c1b0
Compare
geekosaur
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It has (finally) occurred to me to wonder if we can define bidirectional pattern synonyms with the old names for constructors like this, and mark them as deprecated so users get warnings. We might then remove them in 3.20. I won't block the PR on that, though.
0e6c1b0 to
e0fd861
Compare
e0fd861 to
5fc69e7
Compare
That's possible but I don't think the effort is worth it. I searched GitHub for the typo "CVExpliticDepsCustomSetup" and the only hits were in forks of |
Thanks @geekosaur. |
Merge Queue Status
This pull request spent 24 minutes 49 seconds in the queue, including 14 minutes 15 seconds running CI. Required conditions to merge
ReasonThe merge conditions cannot be satisfied due to failing checks Failing checks: HintYou may have to fix your CI before adding the pull request to the queue again. |
|
@Mergifyio queue |
Merge Queue Status
This pull request spent 2 hours 1 minute 45 seconds in the queue, including 1 hour 50 minutes 23 seconds running CI. Required conditions to merge
|
|
That was a new one: communication failure with the runner. |
A follow on from #11501. This changes a couple of data constructors in
Cabal.Template Α: This PR modifies behaviour or interface
Include the following checklist in your PR:
significance: significantin the changelog file.