Description
Hi all 👋🏼
I've been setting up auth for my server using servant-auth
and servant-auth-server
I've run into a few different issues, first for a bit of context:
- We're using JWT access tokens for our authentication, the tokens contain only a signed user ID which we then use to look up the user attributes in a DB
- We don't really have any use for cookie auth or sessions at the moment.
Pursuing this goal, I added the following type:
data AccessTokenClaims = AccessTokenClaims
{ userID :: UserId,
scope :: Scopes
}
instance FromJWT AccessTokenClaims where
decodeJWT :: ClaimsSet -> Either Text AccessTokenClaims
decodeJWT claims = do
userID <- fromMaybe (Left "Invalid sub") (claims ^? claimSub . _Just . JWT.string . to IDs.fromText)
pure (AccessTokenClaims {..})
where
resultEither = \case
Aeson.Error err -> Left (Text.pack err)
Aeson.Success a -> Right a
Now I use Auth '[JWT] AccessTokenClaims
in my API routes, but my call to hoistServerWithContext
complains:
• No instance for (HasContextEntry '[] CookieSettings)
arising from a use of ‘hoistServerWithContext’
Which is strange because I'm not reading or setting cookies anywhere, nor do I intend to.
I've read elsewhere that servant-auth
sets session cookies for all users regardless of whether you want it to, and as a result ALSO requires a ToJWT
instance on anything that Auth
returns. This is at worst an annoyance for AccessTokenClaims
, but I proceeded to add a custom combinator which reads and validates the jwt, and then loads the user from our DB:
type AuthedUser = Auth '[UserByJWT] User
data UserByJWT
instance IsAuth UserByJWT User where
type AuthArgs UserByJWT = '[PG.Connection, JWTSettings]
runAuth _ _ conn jwtSettings = do
AccessTokenClaims {userID} <- jwtAuthCheck jwtSettings
mayUser <- liftIO $ runReaderT (PG.userByUserId userID) conn
maybe (fail "User not found") pure mayUser
The idea here is to allow loading the authenticated user for all requests which need it.
However once again I'm told that I need ToJWT
for User
, which implies that Auth wants to save User
in a session cookie. I don't want the User to be saved in a session cookie, not only is it potentially large, but it may hold sensitive information that shouldn't leave the server.
It seems like this isn't how Auth is intended to be used, but simultaneously seems like the most sensible way to load an authenticated user safely.
I suspect I could write my own combinator to do this which circumvents servant-auth
entirely, or I can just load the user inside every endpoint which requires it; but figured I'd ask whether this is something servant-auth supports somehow first.