Skip to content

Use inmemory and tcp backend in CI #247

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

qnikst
Copy link
Contributor

@qnikst qnikst commented Jul 3, 2015

@facundominguez
Copy link
Contributor

I can't see any tests executed in the travis logs.

@qnikst qnikst force-pushed the use-inmemory-tests branch from dd283a2 to a040f57 Compare July 6, 2015 08:58
@qnikst
Copy link
Contributor Author

qnikst commented Jul 6, 2015

This error is intended unless we merge PR mentioned above.

@qnikst qnikst force-pushed the use-inmemory-tests branch from a040f57 to f05a278 Compare July 13, 2015 18:21
@facundominguez
Copy link
Contributor

PR haskell-distributed/distributed-process-tests#19 was merged. This PR still fails CI. But I'm not sure the failure is related.

@qnikst
Copy link
Contributor Author

qnikst commented Jul 16, 2015

Seems related, will check that later

@qnikst
Copy link
Contributor Author

qnikst commented Jul 17, 2015

Seems that inmemory tests healed, can we merge this?

@facundominguez
Copy link
Contributor

I still can't see tests run in the travis output.

@qnikst
Copy link
Contributor Author

qnikst commented Jul 20, 2015

I have no idea how to show results while performing cabal install --run-tests, but have you seen build test runtime errors before things got fixed in d-p-tests?

@facundominguez
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@facundominguez
Copy link
Contributor

@qnikst, fix conflicts?

@facundominguez
Copy link
Contributor

Done under tag v0.6.0.

@facundominguez facundominguez deleted the use-inmemory-tests branch January 29, 2016 17:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants